How NOT To Blow Your Harvard Interview

by

In terms of intellectual preparation, you just have to make sure you don’t get lost. Go through your resume and for every job and transition in your life be prepared to crisply explain why you did it, and your stories and explain why you did it, what it was like, what you learned, and how you would do it differently. Be able to talk about every job in 40 seconds. Don’t feel the need for completeness. If they are interested, they will ask a follow-up question.

So Harvard and other schools are looking for succinct and clear answers, not meandering detours for answers. Makes sense to me.

The answers need to be specific, crisp, and articulate. They want to see you draw a straight line from one end of the canvas to another. The way you mess up a question is to draw an squiggly line across the canvas. You need pop-up answers. Why I took this job? What my best accomplishment on this job was? What the culture of the firm, was and why I took my next job and how I would improve the job looking backwards. The correct answer to the Cornell question is, ‘I lived in New York and wanted to get away from home yet not leave the East Coast. I was interested in liberal arts and not certain at the time what my major goals were. My high school guidance counselor and friends who went there suggested I look at Cornell. On my campus visit, I was excited by the enthusiasm of the students, and I immediately felt that it was a place where I could feel at home. Looking through the course catalog, I got really excited.’ The quickest way to get rejected is to answer with a ‘duh’ because you’re surprised at how simple the question is. A lot of people are thrown by this question. Kids who went to Harvard College are asked why they chose Harvard and often have to watch themselves from saying, ‘duh!’

There’s got to be more to it than that. I imagine that Harvard and other schools are looking for certain answers.

Aside from getting lost, the second way smart people flunk an interview is by being a super jerk. Super jerks come in all types: there is the Bain/McKinsey super jerk, the Goldman super jerk, and the Teach for America and World Bank super jerk, and most recently, the Google super jerk. Almost any Bain Capital or TPG guy dinged by HBS has flunked the interview on the jerk meter.

Non-HBS types come in all varieties. About 20% of the Harvard admissions committee members dislike  investment bankers and private equity people. They are just looking for you to say something that is not politically correct. If you tell Harvard you are interested in opportunistic investments in distressed debts because you can make a killing, or even any nice version of that, you have just committed suicide. Instead, they want to hear you say you are interested in investing in companies that can really make a difference. ‘My greatest transaction was in supporting an orphan drug company that created a drug to help people with a rare type of diabetes.’ Or that you found a creative way to help finance a social enterprise in rural India to provide clean drinking water to people.’

It’s hard to believe they’ll fall for that, but I get the double bottom line emphasis, given all the accusations about greed. How should an applicant dress for the interview?

There are two mistakes you can make here. One of them is making a statement with what you wear. If you are a banker, don’t show up looking like Michael Douglas in Wall Street. You shouldn’t be on campus wearing a white collar on a blue shirt or a pair of gold cufflinks. Definitely no suspenders. You are not getting credit for suspenders when you are 24-years-old. The shoes should not scream ‘these are $1,000 shoes!’ The other mistake is more rare. Some techies often show up from work wearing chinos. You don’t need to wear a suit; you can wear a blazer, but dress in a way that shows you are taking this event seriously. For women, you should be a cross between Hilary Clinton and Carly Fiorina. Don’t make a statement in terms of accessories. Go light on the bling.

Are there different rules for an interview at Stanford where it’s generally more laidback?

You may be able to wear jeans to a Stanford interview if it’s pre-arranged in the back and forth with the alum who will interview you. Because alumni generally do the interviews, they sometimes set it up at Starbucks on a Saturday. You can say, ‘Is this Saturday dress or business casual?’ If the guy is nice, he’ll say, ‘Well, I’ll be wearing jeans.’ But you could have one in a Starbucks on a Saturday. You can say, ‘I’ll be wearing Saturday casual and the guy might say sure. But I wouldn’t do it unannounced.

How does an applicant prep for one of these interviews?

You should know what the standard questions are. About 90% of the questions are, ‘Take me through every line of your resume.’ They say, ‘Why did you go there?’ They are obsessed with transitions. ‘What did you accomplish? How did you accomplish it? How would you do it differently?’

You also should be prepared to discuss how the economic downturn has affected you and your industry.

And then, there are frequent flyer questions like, ‘What did you think of the application? Have you attended an HBS class?’ That is an important question. Your answer should be truthful. If you haven’t, you should say so but add that you have seen a video of a class on the Harvard website. And then you should be able to do a song and dance on what you thought of a class. The big mistake is to say, ‘I went to UVA (University of Virginia) and I’ve had case study classes so it’s not going to be a problem for me. Harvard is looking for case method virgins. They want you not to have been to the big city. They want you to say, ‘Golly, holy smokes, the class was a mind blow. I was really impressed with the energy and with how the case study helped students bring to bear their different experiences and backgrounds in the class discussion.’ The wise guy UVA answer by inference says, ‘I have done this before and it won’t be a problem for me and I can give a better answer than the guy next to me when the time comes.’ That answer becomes the first drop of poison in the cup. If you keep answering that way, you are toast. Goodbye.

Pages: 1 2 3

  • http://CaliforniaEquity.com Bruce Conn

    Sandy, I stumbled upon your article by pure accident. It’s really good. You have a talent for “telling it like it is” in the most straight forward manner I can recall. What an intimate insight you have to the workings of the process, the people, and especially their personal agendas.

    Enough from me. Great article!

    Bruce Conn
    Trabuco Canyon, CA

  • Kyle

    There’s something inconsistent with the HBS figure. According to their website, their yield is around 89%. Shouldn’t that put their number of acceptances around 1,020, rather than 1,160?

  • someone

    You make it sound like not getting in to Harvard is the end of the world. Harvard MBAs honestly don’t have the best reputation in the real world, so I’m not sure it’s the best example, but your career prospects 5 years after graduating from Harvard aren’t noticeably different than 5 years after graduating from any of the top 25 schools.

    It also comes down to fit. Didn’t get into Harvard? Maybe that’s because it wasn’t the best fit for you and the interviewer could sense it. Maybe they’re right! There are a ton of EXCELLENT business schools; and the students at all of them are incredibly smart and driven. I didn’t get into Harvard myself, but after visiting a number of schools, I found another top school where I felt very much at home. In the end my job prospects aren’t damaged in the least (actually; they’re probably better since the class size is much smaller than HBS yet most of the same companies recruit here.)

    Basically, the gap between HBS and the rest of the top 25 has narrowed significantly in the last 15 years; both in terms of salaries and job opportunities. Students who restrict themselves to a couple of top programs are doing themselves a disservice.

  • Bruce Vann
  • hbs alum

    Sandy, this interview was interesting and thoughtful, and in many ways true. That said, I’d like to offer some additional perspective based on my experiences in the interview and ultimately at Harvard.

    -I went to UVA. I’m pretty sure I got directly asked about the case method question and discussed why I thought it would be good for me to go through the process again (with a classroom of people, including myself, who had several years work experience, versus a group of ripe-eyed 20 year olds who had very little prior experience). I think there is a benefit to some people having gone through the case method before, and I don’t think it’s necessarily detrimental to have said you have done so. They admit people into HBS who went to the McIntire School (UVA’s school that uses the case method) every year. They also admit several JDs from a range of schools who teach through this method.

    -With regards to the finance / investment banker questions, I think that your comment about discussing what makes a difference vs. what makes you money is spot on, but I’d also add that quite a few people REALLY DO WANT to make a difference! HBS is not a place where being solely focused on money (or yourself) makes you all that popular, or well-liked (I’m not saying it’s not there, but it’s probably there a lot less than one would think.). It’s not about putting on a facade at the interview – it’s about really believing you want to make change and explaining how you would like to do that with your talent, experience, and skills.

    -Regarding “questions that question” HBS, there’s generally a good and a bad way to ask them. In the above example, you could say “How does HBS think about teaching subjects, such as finance, using the case method when it’s taught so differently elsewhere?” I think the advice that Sandy gets to is correct – don’t be judgmental about HBS’s choices – but it’s also okay (and well received!) to be inquisitive. Despite popular belief, very few people at Harvard think they’re perfect (or the school is perfect), and the entire case method in and of itself is designed to help people get to answers that might not be obvious from the getgo.

    Lastly, what “someone” said was right; there are a lot of great schools for everyone, and more than one for lots of people. I adored Harvard, but would have been really happy at other schools as well. Look at it this way, you wouldn’t have plunked $250+ on an application to a school if you didn’t think you’d be happy there, right? So embrace the admissions that you do get and enjoy the experience!

  • Carlos

    John:

    I am surprised of how much importance the admissions consultants culture has gained, in the near future I wil begin with my admissions process to several schools.

    Which consultants you think are the best and pay special attention into the clients particular features such as personality, abilities, interests in order to choose the schools that best fit him?

    Thanks, Carlos.

Partner Sites: C-Change Media | Poets & Quants