GPAs & GMATs: What You Need To Get In

by John A. Byrne on Print Print

The most reliable indicator of whether you can get into an MBA program at a top business school typically rests with two numbers: Your undergraduate grade point average and your GMAT or GRE score. The better those two numbers, the better your chances of getting into a highly ranked program.

It’s as simple as that. Yes, there’s lots more to an application than those two raw scores, but if you don’t fall within the ranges of each school’s accepted GMATs and GPAs, your chances narrow considerably.

If you want to get into Stanford, that pretty much means you need to have a GPA between 3.36 and 3.97 on a 4.0-scale and a GMAT score between 680 and 770 on an 800-scale. Those are the 10th and 90th percentile numbers for the Stanford class that entered in the fall of 2011. Few schools, by the way, publish the full range, though Harvard Business School is an exception. At HBS, the latest entering class had members with GMATs as low as 490 and as high as 790, though your chances of getting into Harvard with a GMAT below 700 are awfully slim.

If you want to get into Northwestern’s Kellogg School, you’ll essentially need to have a GPA between 3.19 and 3.88 and a GMAT within the range of 660 and 760 (see table for the top 25 school numbers).


Source: Kaplan Test Prep 2011 study of admissions officers

No matter what admission officials or consultants say, this is unfortunately one of the unshakeable truths of the B-school admissions game. In an ideal world, a GMAT score would just be another data point, perhaps equal to any other in your application, from recommendation letters to how you craft your essays. But last year’s survey by Kaplan Test Prep of B-school admissions officers showed that a low GMAT or GRE score is the single biggest reason why business schools ding MBA applicants. The survey found that 58% of some 265 responding admissions officers said that a weak score on the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) or the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) is the biggest application killer (see survey results in table above). That was up ten percentage points over Kaplan’s 2010 survey which showed that 48% identified the exams’ score as the biggest killer.

A low undergraduate GPA placed second at 24%, below last year’s 33% citation, while the lack of relevant work experience followed at just 12%.

While this fact is hardly surprising to most business school observers, admissions officials tend to downplay the importance of any one piece of the MBA application. However, the Kaplan report, which includes responses from the admissions offices of 22 of the top 30 U.S. business schools, confirms that an applicant’s GMAT or GRE score far outweighs consideration of any other factor in a candidate’s chances.


One likely reason for the GMAT or GRE’s outsized importance is that it is a recent objective measure of an applicant’s ability to tackle the academics of an MBA program. Another likely reason is that an entering class’s average GMAT score is heavily weighted in rankings of  business schools by U.S. News & World Report, The Financial Times, and The Economist. So some admissions offices often are under pressure to keep those scores as high as possible.

Generally, these scores are highly correlated with a school’s given ranking because they are the easiest and most visible way to measure the quality of the MBA candidates enrolled in an MBA program.

(The latest GMAT and GPA stats for the top 25 full-time MBA programs in the U.S. are on the following page)

1 2 Next
Air Time - Comments
  • angry_pickle

    Those tests were created over 50 years ago.

  • JohnAByrne


    Yes, indeed. In fact, we took a look at GMAT and GPA changes at the top 50 business schools over the past five years. See here:

    Average GMATs:

    Average GPAs:

  • Sally A

    Is there an updated version of this today?

  • GW

    That won’t keep you out of Harvard if you have the money to go. You won’t get a scholarship.

  • Lili

    dude, just shutup.

  • anon


  • Bored

    A few things:
    1) I don’t agree with GM’s statements
    2) in his defense he doesn’t say all people that go to top schools are successful businessmen. He said, that of the portion of people who did go to bschool and whom did become successful (1%>X>100%) didnt take the GMAT
    3) George Bush is known for having gotten into both Yale and HBS based purely on his father’s connections and name. Though there may still be a small percentage of similarly-situated folks today, the fact is in the last 15 years, the percent of such students has dropped precipitously (and is almost non existent at Yale undergrad – no connections are getting a C student with horrible SATs in).
    4) {cut and paste} Changes in the Administration of the GMAT

    In the fifty-five years since the first meeting of the Graduate Business Admission Council (changed to the Graduate Management Admission Council in 1976), nearly every aspect of the test has changed. In 1976, the name of the exam changed from the Admissions Test for Graduate Study in Business (ATGSB) to the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT). In 1955, one year after the exam was first administered, the Quantitative and Verbal sectional scores were added. In 1961 all but one of the question types were changed and they continued to change until 1994. The length of time required to take the test grew from two hours and twenty-five minutes in 1954 to four hours in 1994 and settled at the current three hours thirty minutes in 1997. Even the test developers have changed. ETS developed GMAT questions until 2006 when GMAC changed vendors to ACT Inc. Since 1954 the only things that has not changed is the GMAC’s desire to test those skills necessary to succeed in graduate business schools’ core curriculums, the belief that the skills tested on the exam develop over a relatively long period of time, and quantitative problem solving questions.

  • ALD

    Didn’t George Bush Jr. get his MBA at Harvard?

  • Happy

    Hi there,

    That is why I am sticking to the no name brand universities. I applied for them and all i care for is it is a Regional and AACSB International accredited Graduate Business programs. I don’t want to compete and be stressed out all time. Just be happy, degree is a degree, what you do with it, is more important. Luck is a huge factor in any one’s success. Good luck to all of you!

    “bummed”, your post is funny!
    Just be happy :)

Our Partner Sites: C-Change Media | Poets & Quants for Execs | Poets & Quants for Undergrads | Tipping the Scales

Site Design By: