Poets&Quants’ Top 100 U.S. MBA Programs of 2012

by

The Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University began to show the benefits of new leadership by rising two places to fifth this year

For the third consecutive year, Harvard Business School remained at the top of Poets&Quants’ 2012 composite ranking of the business schools with the best full-time MBA programs. Harvard was followed by the No. 2 Stanford Graduate School of Business, No. 3 the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, and No. 4 the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.

It was the exact same lineup of top four business schools that made our 2011 list of the best 100 MBA programs in the U.S.

Among the top 25 business schools, the biggest news is that Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management is beginning to show improvement under Dean Sally Blount who took over the school in July of 2010. Her new leadership team has turned the business school upside down, rethinking every aspect of the MBA program and the entire institution. Kellogg rose two places to finish fifth this year, jumping over MIT Sloan and Columbia.

COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL WAS THE ONLY SCHOOL IN THE TOP 25 TO DROP TWO PLACES IN RANK

No. 7 Columbia, meantime, was the only school in the top 25 to fall two places. The school’s weaker position is largely due to lower levels of graduate satisfaction with the MBA program. MBA graduates complained about the uneven quality of teaching in the first-year core curriculum, the university resources devoted to the business school, the outreach by career services to companies other than consulting and banking, and the acceptance of ‘connected’ applicants. “Too many students are ‘sons of,’” claimed one MBA graduate. “They are plain dumb but got in because dad or mom wrote a big check to the school. This is not acceptable.”

Those issues have been compounded by the decline of Wall Street, a steep 19% fall in MBA applications during the 2011-2012 academic year, and criticism of Dean R. Glenn Hubbard’s leadership of the school. Some students believe that Hubbard, whose credibility was questioned during a confrontational interview in the Academy Award-winning documentary Inside Job, has been a largely absent dean due to his involvement as an economic adviser to Mitt Romney during the Presidential election.

Unlike other rankings, the Poets&Quants composite list combines the latest five most influential business school rankings in the world: Bloomberg BusinessWeek, The Economist, The Financial Times, Forbes, and U.S. News & World Report. Instead of merely averaging the five, each ranking is separately weighted to account for our view of their authority and credibility. (The BusinessWeek, Forbes and U.S. News lists are given a weight of 25% each, while the FT is given a 15% weight and The Economist is given a 10% weight).

Combining the five most influential rankings doesn’t eliminate the flaws in each system, but it does significantly diminish them. When an anomaly pops on one list due to either faulty survey technique or biased methodology, bringing all the data together tends to suppress it. So the composite index tones down the noise in each of these five surveys to get more directly at the real signal that is being sent. Our list of the top 50 non-U.S. MBA programs for 2012 is published separately.

A COMPOSITE INDEX THAT IS NOT UNLIKE NATE SILVER’S APPROACH TO ANALYSIS

This is not unlike the prescient analysis that Nate Silver, the New York Times blogger, brought to the recent Presidential election. By smartly analyzing each political poll and averaging the results across all of them, Silver came to a greater truth than could be revealed by any single poll. When the election was done, he was pretty much the only outside observer who had accurately predicted the popular vote and the electoral vote outcome.

The index numbers accompanying the rank of each school allows you to assess how far above or behind one school is versus another. This is especially helpful because in some cases there is no meaningful difference between the schools. Yet, some of these rankings, including The Financial Times, still fail to provide the underlying index numbers that lead to a numerical rank.

Consider Southern Methodist University’s Cox School, ranked 47th this year with an index score of 43.9, versus UC-Irvine’s Merage, ranked right behind it at 48th, with an index score of 43.6. The difference between those two schools, separated by all of .3 on our index, can not be truly captured by a ranking. In terms of their market reputations, they are equal–based on this rankings result.

THERE’S ALWAYS A NEED TO LOOK BEYOND THE RANKINGS TO DECIDE IF A SCHOOL IS RIGHT FOR YOU

If you intend to make your professional career in Dallas, SMU is obviously the better bet. The degree not only would carry more prestige in the Texas area, the school’s alumni network would be better connected there as well. And if you intend to work in Southern California, UC-Irvine would likely be the better choice. To choose either of these two schools on the basis of their ranking would be foolhardy.

DON’T MISS: POETS&QUANTS’ TOP 50 NON-U.S. MBA PROGRAMS OF 2012 or ALPHABETICAL LIST OF THE WORLD’S TOP  BUSINESS SCHOOLS

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

  • Jimmy

    I disagree in everything you said. Duke as number 10 is about right. It cannot be in front of Tuck which is one of the best school in Finance and who is ranked number 2 by The Economist and number 6 by Forbes. Fuqua never reach such rankings anywhere. Haas is just the third hardest school to get after Harvard and Stanford and has an incredible selectivity rate and amazing jobs in High Tech due to its location. MIT is at its right place and I would say exactly the contrary of what you said about Columbia. For me, Columbia is the historical number 4 of the rankings behind Harvard, Stanford and… Wharton (and not Chicago which is overanked by P&Q). You can take all the stats: from number of applicants, salaries and bonuses and above all the number of students who choose to go Columbia when they are accepted at both Chicago, MIT and Columbia. Add the fact that many students want to stay in NY and that the school attracts such Super star teacher as the Nobel Prize Mister Stiglitz or the lectures of the alumni Warren Buffett….and you have the solid & historical number 4 of the ranking. I cannot understand that this school is so underevaluated here.

  • BHT

    Indiana university is in Indiana — IN — is the state abbreviation. Currently you’re showing IA (Iowa). Thanks for sharing the list!

  • BSchoolAspirant

    Yes, UCLA and Carnegie Melon are way lower than Duke and Cornell. But you are right, all schools send people to amazing professions – so it is a moot point. But, both Duke and Cornell have national reputations (and growing international reputations) while UCLA and Tepper are often considered regional schools. It is not a bad thing at all – you just need to determine if you want to be in LA or Pittsburgh. If you want to be in either city, I don’t think any school other than Harvard or Stanford will give you the same leverage as UCLA and Tepper. That being said, I am one who is open to living throughout the US, so I would argue Fuqua (Duke) and Johnson (Cornell) are better fits. Good luck.

  • MastersBeingAmazing

    ok…so exactly what is your point? Are you implying that aside from the schools you’ve listed that “all the rest” aren’t good schools? That seems very silly to me. I’d argue that plenty of people from Yale, Duke, Johnson, Darden, Ross, Haas, Anderson etc. etc. receive the same jobs or similar jobs as those students from the “elite” schools that you’ve mentioned. I think your way of viewing it is rather funneled and not objective. Now, after the top 20, yes, I would agree that you can say “all the rest.” And, I don’t mean that in a demeaning way (at least I hope I didn’t offend anyone reading this), but recruiting for coveted jobs like management consulting, i-banking, asset management, etc. after the top 20 schools is much harder due to lack of recruiters coming to campus because of the non-top 20 rank…unfortunately, it is a vicious cycle….

  • MastersBeingAmazing

    Economist rankings are so stupid…frankly, I think Mr. Byrne should just get rid of it from the composite rankings. According to the Economist, Harvard and Stanford are 4 and 8, respectively. Really? No. And yes, I agree that Economist is underrating Fuqua…Fuqua has grounded itself as a top 10 school…Cornell is on its way too. I think Columbia will also remain in the top 10, but we will see more ties among schools (kind of how US News ranks Public Policy programs)…

  • Dukie

    MastersBeingAmazing, completely agreed! Well said…thanks for this insight.

    I think prospective students should look at employment reports. That is a great indicator of how schools are viewed from the perspective of employers (which is arguably the most important perspective given the nature of an MBA).

  • georgios

    guyz any take on hult..i can see its not in the list..

  • Hello!

    I second this comment. This person has the order right as well within the same tier.

  • Rebecca

    Why is Tuck always ranked so high? I feel like they are always inflated in rankings. I would argue that given employment statistics and CEOs that are churned out, schools like Duke, Darden, Yale, Cornell, and UCLA should be ranked above Tuck…never could understand what really drives their ranking…As someone based on the west coast, I know very few Tuck alumni. Probably a regional business school…

    And regarding the ivy league business schools, here is an order I propose: Harvard, UPenn, Columbia, Cornell, Yale, Dartmouth. Tuck has gotta be last among the ivy league schools…my humble opinion at least! Yale also isn’t great, but I feel they have potential…cornell is definitely on the rise…

  • Pat Simmons

    Duke and Cornell have national reputations, but UCLA doesn’t? I would agree Tepper lacks in that category, but I would say UCLA has a better national reputation than Duke, and probably on par with Cornell. UCLA is also a much bigger international name than either Duke or Cornell (especially on the pacific rim).
    Duke and Cornell are great schools, but I would say UCLA is right there with them. Trying to distinguish between those 3 is splitting hairs.

  • Bob Marley

    It’s Harvard and Chicago that have produced the best business minds in the world. Think of the founders of the following top companies in the most sought after industries post MBA:

    Private Equity: Blackstone, Carlyle, Oaktree, Advent, etc.

    Management Consulting: McKinsey, Boston Consulting Group

    Hedge Funds: Too long of a list

Partner Sites: C-Change Media | Poets & Quants