2014 Financial Times’s Global MBA Ranking

Top 26-50 Full-Time MBA Programs

In Financial Times’ 2014 Global MBA Ranking

 

2014 Rank & School 2013 Rank Change Weighted Salary Increase in Pay
26. UCLA (Anderson) 23 -3 $140,712 97%
27. Virginia (Darden) 35 +8 $142,131 104%
27. Cornell (Johnson) 24 -3 $136,707 103%
29. Univ. of Hong Kong 31 +2 $113,038 109%
30. IIM-Ahmedabad 26 -4 $157,459 86%
31. SDA Bocconi 39 -8 $112,901 112%
32. University of Singapore 36 +4 $91,358 147%
33. UNC (Kenan-Flagler) 45 +12 $124,669 101%
34. Carnegie Mellon (Tepper) 43 +9 $129,296 98%
35. Rice (Jones) 37 +2 $118,473 120%
36. Georgetown (McDonough) 40 +4 $124,990 98%
36. Indian School of Business 34 -2 $117,308 130%
38. Nanyang 32 -6 $96,202 112%
39. Texas-Austin (McCombs) 46 +7 $129,225 89%
39. Rotterdam 33 -6 $98,771 94%
41. Emory (Goizueta) 49 +8 $122,468 103%
41. City University (Cass) 40 -1 $110,260 76%
43. Manchester 29 -14 $106,535 96%
44. Illinois-Urbana 44 $112,482 111%
45. Sungkyunkwan University 51 +6 $110,828 86%
46. Cranfield 38 -8 $120,941 75%
47. Indiana (Kelley) 54 +7 $112,353 116%
48. UC-Irvine (Merage) 54 +6 $106,764 100%
49. Imperial 42 -7 $103,604 68%
50. Maryland (Smith) 50 $107,236 93%

Source: Financial Times 2014 Global MBA Ranking

DON’T MISS: BIGGEST WINNERS & LOSERS IN THE FINANCIAL TIMES’ 2014 MBA RANKING

Questions about this article? Email us or leave a comment below.