Stanford GSB | Mr. Future Tech In Healthcare
GRE 313, GPA 2.0
MIT Sloan | Mr. Agri-Tech MBA
GRE 324, GPA 4.0
Stanford GSB | Ms. Anthropologist
GMAT 740, GPA 3.3
MIT Sloan | Mr. Aker 22
GRE 332, GPA 3.4
UCLA Anderson | Ms. Tech In HR
GMAT 640, GPA 3.23
UCLA Anderson | Mr. Military To MGMNT Consulting
GMAT 740, GPA 3.7
MIT Sloan | Ms. Environmental Sustainability
GMAT 690, GPA 7.08
Wharton | Mr. Data Scientist
GMAT 740, GPA 7.76/10
Harvard | Ms. Nurturing Sustainable Growth
GRE 300, GPA 3.4
MIT Sloan | Ms. Senior PM Unicorn
GMAT 700, GPA 3.18
Harvard | Mr. Lieutenant To Consultant
GMAT 760, GPA 3.7
Duke Fuqua | Ms. Consulting Research To Consultant
GMAT 710, GPA 4.0 (no GPA system, got first (highest) division )
Stanford GSB | Mr. “GMAT” Grimly Miserable At Tests
GMAT TBD - Aug. 31, GPA 3.9
MIT Sloan | Mr. Electrical Agri-tech
GRE 324, GPA 4.0
Yale | Mr. IB To Strategy
GRE 321, GPA 3.6
Harvard | Mr. Overrepresented MBB Consultant (2+2)
GMAT 760, GPA 3.95
Kellogg | Ms. Freelance Hustler
GRE 312, GPA 4
Kellogg | Ms. Gap Fixer
GMAT 740, GPA 3.02
Harvard | Mr. Little Late For MBA
GRE 333, GPA 3.76
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Wellness Ethnographer
GRE 324, GPA 3.6
Wharton | Ms. Financial Real Estate
GMAT 720, GPA 4.0
Harvard | Mr. The Italian Dream Job
GMAT 760, GPA 4.0
NYU Stern | Mr. Labor Market Analyst
GRE 320, GPA 3.4
Wharton | Mr. Indian IT Auditor
GMAT 740, GPA 3.8
Berkeley Haas | Mr. LGBT+CPG
GMAT 720, GPA 3.95
Kellogg | Mr. Naval Architect
GMAT 740, GPA 4.0
Harvard | Mr. Navy Submariner
GRE 322, GPA 3.24

The Financials Behind the Harvard-Stanford Rivalry

Harvard Business School across the Charles River

Stanford vs. Harvard. No matter what different rankings of the best business schools show, the general agreement among those in the know is that these are the two best business schools in the world. The two giants of business education get more applications for their MBA programs than any other schools. Stanford, given its smaller entering class size of 390, is the most selective business school in the world. Harvard, with an entering class of 910, is not far behind.

We’ve compared these two schools on the basic academic and cultural differences in one of our B-school smackdown reports. We’ve also taken a look at how their initiatives in entrepreneurship stack up against each other. But how would these two schools compare if they were companies instead of educational institutions? Unlike many schools, Harvard and Stanford produce annual financial reports that allow a rare inside glimpse of both powerhouses. Stanford’s just released its investors report for the fiscal year ended Aug. 31. Harvard has yet to publish its report for the fiscal year ended June 30th, but the 2009 document is available online.

When you look at the underlying financials of both institutions, you quickly understand that Stanford is the David to the Goliath that is Harvard. Stanford’s annual revenue of $155 million in 2010 is about a third of Harvard’s $472 million in 2009. Predictably, that’s because every line item in the budget at Harvard is significantly larger than Stanford, whether it’s tuition and fees or endowment income.

Stanford saw a decline in endowment income in 2010 to $52 million from $58.8 million a year earlier. The school largely offset the decline by rising tuition and fees from students which brought in $70.9 million last year, up from $64.5 million in 2009. The result: Student tuition and fees now account for 46% of Stanford’s annual operating budget, up from 42% in 2009.

What else do these reports tell you about the East Coast-West Coast rivalry between the two best schools in management education?

  • Stanford alums seem more loyal and committed to their alma mater than those from Harvard. Some 41% of Stanford alums made gifts to the school in 2010, compared to  24% of Harvard’s MBA alumni in 2009 (though HBS had a near 30% participation rate in 2008).
  • While a higher percentage of Stanford alums open their wallets to the school, Harvard’s much larger alumni base ultimately means that HBS gets more in cash gifts annually. Stanford’s take from annual gifts and its business school fund was $26.8 million last year, versus Harvard’s $37 million in cash gifts in 2009 (a year earlier, before the recession hit, HBS brought in $51 million).
  • Harvard Business School’s endowment totals $2.8 billion, more than triple Stanford’s $825 million. The endowment at Columbia Business School, in contrast, is just $409 million for fiscal 2010.
  • When it comes to tuition and fees, Harvard brings in a remarkable $191 million a year. That compares with Stanford’s $70.9 million in 2010. The biggest difference, besides the larger size of the Harvard class, is executive education. Harvard brought in $107 million in tuition from exec ed in 2009. Stanford did not break out its exec ed revenue.
  • Not surprisingly, Harvard gets significant cash each year from its publishing operations which are the envy of every business school in the world. In 2009, Harvard sold a record number of case studies: 8,334,000, up from 6,958,000 five years earlier. The school also sold 1,478,000 copies of Harvard Press books, along with 2,863,000 copies of Harvard Business Review reprints. All told, the school’s publishing gold mine brought in $137 million in revenue. At Stanford and most other schools, it’s pretty much zero. Put another way, what Harvard brings in annually in publishing revenue is more than double Stanford’s endowment income.
  • Harvard is more generous with fellowship support to its MBA students than Stanford. Stanford said it spent $14.3 million on student fellowships last year, down about $300,000 from the previous year. About 56% of the MBA received fellowship support with an average award of $20,240. At Harvard, the average annual award came to just over $24,700, with a two-year MBA fellowship of $49,500, up from $24,500 five years earlier. Total financial aid for students at Harvard in 2009 was $33 million.