Stanford GSB | Mr. Deferred MBA
GMAT 760, GPA 3.82
Harvard | Mr. Investment Banker
GMAT 750, GPA 4.0
McCombs School of Business | Mr. Military 2.0
GRE 310, GPA 2.3
McCombs School of Business | Mr. Consulting Analyst
GMAT 700, GPA 7.7/10
Stanford GSB | Mr. FinTech Engineer
GMAT 760, GPA 3.8
MIT Sloan | Mr. Hopeful CXO
GMAT 750, GPA 3.56
Harvard | Mr. Bangladeshi Analyst
GMAT 690, GPA 3.31
Yale | Mr. Fencer
GMAT 740, GPA 3.48
INSEAD | Mr. Indian In Cambodia
GMAT 730, GPA 3.33
Kenan-Flagler | Mr. Top Three
GRE 310, GPA 2.7
Tuck | Mr. South African FinTech
GMAT 730, GPA 3.08
London Business School | Mr. Green Energy
GMAT 710, GPA 3.1
IU Kelley | Ms. Marketing Manager
GRE 294, GPA 2.5
Kenan-Flagler | Ms. Nonprofit Admin
GMAT 620, GPA 3.3
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Emporio Armani
GMAT 780, GPA 3.03
Kellogg | Mr. Class President
GRE 319.5, GPA 3.76
Tepper | Mr. Tech Strategist
GRE 313, GPA 3.0
Harvard | Mr. MacGruber
GRE 313, GPA 3.7
Tuck | Mr. Metamorphosis
GRE 324, GPA 3.15
Stanford GSB | Mr. MBA Class of 2023
GMAT 725, GPA 3.5
IMD | Mr. Future Large Corp
GMAT 720, GPA 3.0
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Government Consultant
GMAT 600, GPA 3
Harvard | Mr. Healthcare VC
GMAT 700, GPA 3.7
Yale | Ms. Social Impact
GMAT 680, GPA 3.83
Kellogg | Mr. 770 Dreamer
GMAT 770, GPA 8.77/10
Duke Fuqua | Mr. Agribusiness
GRE 308, GPA 3.04
Wharton | Ms. Healthcare Visionary
GMAT 720, GPA 3.4

Are MOOCs Bad For Business Schools?

online education moocs

The MOOC revolution is upon us. Top B-schools such as Wharton, MIT, and Duke are offering classes online for free or deeply discounted rates. But are they cannibalizing their own potential MBA candidates in the process?

It’s a question that has dogged B-schools from the advent of the cyber courses. A new of study by the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School offers one answer: MOOCs aren’t a threat; they’re a market opportunity. The study surveyed 875,000 students enrolled across nine Wharton MOOCs, and the results, published in the Harvard Business Review, conclude that MOOCs reach three new student populations: foreign-born Americans, under-represented American minorities, and students from outside the U.S.

“There’s a latent demand to take these kinds of courses online,” says researcher Gayle Christensen, executive director of Penn Global. She points out that some 45% of the MOOC enrollees hail from developing countries. Overall, 78% of the MOOC participants surveyed came from outside the U.S. – for comparison, Wharton’s Class of 2015 is 35% international.


Even American enrollees in the Wharton courses represent a departure from the traditional B-school candidate. Under-represented minority students constituted 19% of the U.S. MOOC participants, compared with 7% in Wharton’s ’15 MBA class.  Interestingly, 35% of all U.S. individuals enrolled in the Wharton business MOOCs are foreign-born, compared with only 12.9% of the U.S. population as a whole.

Based on this different demographic, the study’s researchers conclude in the Harvard Business Review that “MOOCs run by elite business schools do not appear to threaten existing programs, but seem to attract students for whom traditional business school offerings are out of reach.”

It’s a compelling conclusion – bringing business education to the masses. But the leap to removing the threat (“MOOCs do not appear to be cannibalizing existing programs”) seems a bit of a stretch and a convenient conclusion for a business school currently offering them. After all, business schools need to make money to survive.


So are these new student populations actually signing up for expensive MBA and executive education programs? Christensen says more research is necessary in the revenue portion but suggests that MOOCs may benefit schools in less financial terms. “My sense is that when I’ve spoken to the faculty  it can help augment their teaching … then they can bring that back to the classroom in new ways,” she says. Co-researcher Brandon Alcom, Penn Global project manager, adds that MOOC research provides a playground for experimenting with new ways of instruction.  “I think that’s one of the great frontiers of MOOC research …there’s the possibility of tracking student learning in a way that isn’t possible in a non-technology-assisted classroom setting,” he says.

But as schools devote more resources to MOOCs, the cash cow programs like executive education will undoubtedly take a hit. At Wharton, exec ed accounts for  20% of the annual revenue; that figure jumps to 26% at Harvard Business School. MOOCs often draw top faculty, technology and resources, creating at the very least a distraction from programs for paying students.

One thing, however, is clear, schools need to rethink the current MOOC monetization model. Many offer a certificate of completion for a fee. However, the Wharton study found that only 5% of enrollees completed all of the course material and assessments. Moreover, less than half (43%) indicated that a completion certificate was “extremely” or “very” important.

The researchers recommend that schools explore monthly subscription or “freemium” models where users can pay extra for consultations with professors or tutoring time with a TA. Alcom predicts that future payment models will exist along a continuum, with highly personalized instruction at the most expensive end and automated or mass teaching experiences at the other.

MOOCs may be expanding their reach and exposing new populations to business education, but they aren’t the “end all, be all,” according to Christensen.  “There’s going to need to be scaffolding around this tool…there have to be other things involved in creating the ecosystem that will allow people to take advantage of this.” For students in developing countries, things like Internet access and higher learning are important prerequisites. For administrators in the U.S., a successful monetization model will likely be the next big focus.

DON’T MISS: The MOOC Revolution: How To Earn An Elite MBA For Free or 25 Essential Business MOOCs For June