Kellogg | Mr. Defense Engineer
GMAT 760, GPA 3.15
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Indian Dreamer
GRE 331, GPA 8.5/10
McCombs School of Business | Mr. Ernst & Young
GMAT 600 (hopeful estimate), GPA 3.86
Kellogg | Mr. Innovator
GRE 300, GPA 3.75
London Business School | Ms. Private Equity Angel
GMAT 660, GPA 3.4
Harvard | Mr. Defense Engineer
GMAT 730, GPA 3.6
Chicago Booth | Ms. Indian Banker
GMAT 740, GPA 9.18/10
Harvard | Ms. Developing Markets
GMAT 780, GPA 3.63
Yale | Ms. Biotech
GMAT 740, GPA 3.29
McCombs School of Business | Mr. Marine Executive Officer
GRE 322, GPA 3.28
Kellogg | Mr. Engineer Volunteer
GMAT 710, GPA 3.8
Stanford GSB | Ms. Global Empowerment
GMAT 740, GPA 3.66
Chicago Booth | Mr. Bank AVP
GRE 322, GPA 3.22
Harvard | Mr. Renewables Athlete
GMAT 710 (1st take), GPA 3.63
Stanford GSB | Mr. Infantry Officer
GRE 320, GPA 3.7
UCLA Anderson | Ms. Apparel Entrepreneur
GMAT 690, GPA 3.2
Harvard | Mr. Armenian Geneticist
GRE 331, GPA 3.7
Berkeley Haas | Mr. 1st Gen Grad
GMAT 740, GPA 3.1
Ross | Mr. Travelpreneur
GMAT 730, GPA 2.68
London Business School | Ms. Numbers
GMAT 730, GPA 3.5
IU Kelley | Mr. Fortune 500
N U Singapore | Mr. Naval Officer
GMAT 710, GPA 3.2
NYU Stern | Ms. Entertainment Strategist
GMAT Have not taken, GPA 2.92
INSEAD | Ms. Spaniard Consultant
GMAT 710, GPA 8.5/10.00
NYU Stern | Mr. Army Prop Trader
GRE 313, GPA 2.31
Chicago Booth | Mr. Unilever To MBB
GRE 308, GPA 3.8
Stanford GSB | Ms. Healthtech Venture
GMAT 720, GPA 3.5

MBA Interview Acceptance Rates?


If you were among the 950 or so lucky round one MBA applicants who received an invitation earlier this month to interview with Harvard Business School, what are your chances of getting an actual acceptance from the school?

That depends, of course, on how well you do in the face-to-face interview with HBS admissions officials. But Wayne Atwell believes your odds of getting an admit letter are roughly 50-50. Atwell, a self-styled data geek, is a second-year MBA student at New York University’s Stern School of Business. Attwell did his undergraduate degree in engineering and worked in strategy and marketing analysis for more than six years in financial services. His post-MBA goal is to land a job at a top consulting firm. One thing is certain: He loves swimming in data.

Passionate about numbers and analysis, he put up a blog called where he grabs info off of GMAT Club forums, plugs them into Excel spreadsheets and comes up with all kinds of odds and stats. Attwell readily admits that his observations are based on roughly 10% of the applicants who share their input on the Internet forums. And he puts a disclaimer on his analysis: “Results may not be 100% accurate,” concedes Atwell, “and are meant to give you a rough idea of your chance of admission.” Yet, Atwell’s observations, if not entirely authoritative, at least have amusing entertainment value, particularly to stressed out and anxious applicants who obsess over getting accepted into a top business school.


Wayne Atwell's data analysis are certainly entertaining

Wayne Atwell’s data analysis are certainly entertaining

He says, for example, that his own school has the highest acceptance rate for applicants who are granted an admissions interview: 75%. In fact, among the top-tier schools, the most likely to send an admit letter to an interviewee besides Stern are UCLA’s Anderson School of Management (68%), Cornell University’s Johnson School of Business (67%), UNC’s Kenan-Flagler Business School (67%), and the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business (65%), according to Atwell.

The schools with the lowest interview acceptance rates? Obviously, Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, largely because it is the only top-rated school that seeks to interview every candidate, and Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business, mostly because it invites anyone who wants an interview to have one. At Kellogg, Atwell pegs the rate of admission for interviewees at 34%. At Tuck, he thinks it is 36%.

Besides Kellogg and Tuck, applicants who get interviews at Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business face the toughest odds of admission. Atwell estimates a candidate’s Stanford chances at 46%, just a sliver below Wharton’s 47%. Of course, Stanford is the most highly selective MBA program in the U.S., with an actual acceptance rate of just under 7% for the 7,899 applicants to the school for the Class of 2017.


More compelling are the data gymnastics Atwell performs on correlations between GMAT and GPA scores and acceptances. In a recent post, for instance, he calculated that an applicant to Stanford who increases his or her GMAT by 100 points, from 650 to 750, hikes their chance of admission by eight-fold. Candidates to Stanford with a perfect GMAT score of 800, estimates Atwell, have a 20% chance of being admitted to the school’s MBA program, nearly three times the actual acceptance rate. At Yale’s School of Management, he calculates, an 800 will get a candidate a whopping acceptance rate of 59%.

If your GMAT is 790, your chances of a Stanford admission fall to 17%. At 780, it’s 14%; and at 770, it’s 12%. A 4.0 GPA would boost an applicant’s acceptance rate to 10%, thinks Atwell. Derrick Bolton, Stanford’s director of MBA admissions, would surely contest those numbers. But that doesn’t make them less compelling. Interestingly enough, these latest projections by Atwell on how GMATs and GPAs impact admission decisions at Stanford are not his first. Atwell says he was less than happy with an original predictive model he built for Stanford, and he explains his rationale in terms that would make any stats professor keen to give him an A in the class.

“I updated my methodology for building the model, mainly in the way I cleaned the data,” he explains on his blog. “In order to evaluate performance, I grouped applicants into buckets based on their predicted acceptance rate, then looked at the actual acceptance rate was for that group. The X-axis is the predicted acceptance grouping and the Y-axis is the actual acceptance rate.”

About The Author

John A. Byrne is the founder and editor-in-chief of C-Change Media, publishers of Poets&Quants and four other higher education websites. He has authored or co-authored more than ten books, including two New York Times bestsellers. John is the former executive editor of Businessweek, editor-in-chief of Businessweek. com, editor-in-chief of Fast Company, and the creator of the first regularly published rankings of business schools. As the co-founder of CentreCourt MBA Festivals, he hopes to meet you at the next MBA event in-person or online.