Kellogg | Ms. Big4 M&A
GMAT 740, GPA 3.7
Stanford GSB | Mr. Army Engineer
GRE 326, GPA 3.89
Chicago Booth | Mr. Healthcare PM
GMAT 730, GPA 2.8
Harvard | Mr. African Energy
GMAT 750, GPA 3.4
Columbia | Mr. Energy Italian
GMAT 700, GPA 3.5
UCLA Anderson | Mr. SME Consulting
GMAT 740, GPA 3.55 (as per WES paid service)
Duke Fuqua | Mr. Quality Assurance
GMAT 770, GPA 3.6
Duke Fuqua | Mr. Salesman
GMAT 700, GPA 3.0
Chicago Booth | Ms. Indian Banker
GMAT 740, GPA 9.18/10
INSEAD | Mr. INSEAD Aspirant
GRE 322, GPA 3.5
Duke Fuqua | Mr. Army Aviator
GRE 314, GPA 3.8
Harvard | Mr. Renewables Athlete
GMAT 710 (1st take), GPA 3.63
Harvard | Mr. Healthcare PE
GRE 340, GPA 3.5
Harvard | Mr. Military Quant
GMAT 730, GPA 3.6
Wharton | Mr. Future Non-Profit
GMAT 720, GPA 8/10
Kellogg | Mr. Concrete Angel
GRE 318, GPA 3.33
Kellogg | Mr. Maximum Impact
GMAT Waiver, GPA 3.77
MIT Sloan | Ms. Rocket Engineer
GMAT 710, GPA 3.9
Wharton | Ms. Interstellar Thinker
GMAT 740, GPA 7.6/10
Harvard | Mr. Finance
GMAT 750, GPA 3.0
Harvard | Mr. Defense Engineer
GMAT 730, GPA 3.6
Kellogg | Ms. Sustainable Development
GRE N/A, GPA 3.4
Chicago Booth | Mr. Unilever To MBB
GRE 308, GPA 3.8
Harvard | Ms. Female Sales Leader
GMAT 740 (target), GPA 3.45
Tuck | Mr. Liberal Arts Military
GMAT 680, GPA 2.9
Harvard | Ms. Gay Techie
GRE 332, GPA 3.88
INSEAD | Mr. Product Manager
GMAT 740, GPA 63%

Study Habits Of GMAT’s Top 10% Scorers

study

When Jeffrey Messina walked into a test center in Tampa, Florida, last year to sit for the GMAT, he was as prepared for the grueling test as a top-notch professional athlete for a big game. The 24-year-old consultant from Washington, D.C., had spent a total of 210 hours studying for the Graduate Management Admission Test over the previous three and one-half months. He had taken off from work the last week before the exam to cram for three solid days and then rest.

As he finished the last question on the three-and-one-half hour test, Messina had a sinking feeling. He didn’t think he had scored all that well. But then his score flashed on the computer screen. Messina, who doesn’t consider himself a natural at standardized testing, got a 760 out of 800, a score that is 213 points above the average and puts him in the 99th percentile of all test takers in the world. And it was his first and only GMAT try.

“I thought, ‘Gosh, I did very well,'” he says with characteristic understatement.

THE STUDY HABITS THAT REALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE

What separates those who score in the upper reaches of the GMAT from those who score below 690?

To find out how the most successful business school aspirants achieve their high scores, Poets&Quants teamed up with Magoosh Test Prep to survey nearly 200 recent GMAT test takers, including Jeffrey Messina. We compared the study habits of students who scored in the top 10% (with a 690 or better) to the rest of the test-taking pool. For the purposes of this survey, students who scored a 690 or above will be referred to as “top scorers” and students who scored below 690 as “other scorers”. A total of 197 students were in the study.

Five Big Takeaways

Confidence is key. Some 66% of top scorers said they felt confident and calm going into the exam, whereas less than half of other scorers felt that way.

Students don’t need to break the bank. The majority of top scorers (58%) spent only $100 to $300 on their test prep. 39% of other scorers spent over $300, while only 31% of top scorers shelled out that much cash.

Regular exercise correlates with higher scores. Of the test takers who exercised at least once per week, the majority (58%) scored a 690 or better.

Forget last-minute cramming. 79% of top scorers gave themselves a break the day before the exam. Only 67% of other scorers did the same.

There’s a study-time sweet spot. A majority of top scorers studied for one to three months and 87% of studied between 1 and 6 months. 32% of other scorers either studied for less than a month or more than 6 months.

‘TREAT IT LIKE A JOB. STICK TO A SCHEDULE’

Consider Messina, who expects to apply to the top five business for entry in the fall of next year. “The biggest thing is to treat it as a job,” he says. “Stick to a schedule, otherwise you will just keep pushing it back.”

The consultant had one advantage: His undergraduate major was economics, with a heavy dose of math. Still, he hadn’t approached the SAT which any systematic rigor, confessing he was more interested in girls and playing soccer. But when it came to the GMAT, Messina adopted an entirely different modus operandi. His demanding job in economics consulting requires 60 hours of work a week. So he had to create a smart study plan.

First, he committed to a date for the test, paying the $250 to take it, allowing himself exactly three and one-half months to study so he wouldn’t be tempted to push back the test. He then adopted a pretty disciplined regimen every day of the week: He would get up at 5 a.m., work out for 30 minutes in the gym, and then study from 5:45 a.m. to 6:45 a.m. When Messina returned from work, he would put in another one to two hours of study every day, from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m.

About The Author

John A. Byrne is the founder and editor-in-chief of C-Change Media, publishers of Poets&Quants and four other higher education websites. He has authored or co-authored more than ten books, including two New York Times bestsellers. John is the former executive editor of Businessweek, editor-in-chief of Businessweek. com, editor-in-chief of Fast Company, and the creator of the first regularly published rankings of business schools. As the co-founder of CentreCourt MBA Festivals, he hopes to meet you at the next MBA event in-person or online.