Temple Dean Sacked Over Ranking Scandal

Temple Fox School of Business Dean M. Moshe Porat

After finding that the Fox School of Business knowingly provided false information to U.S. News over the past several years to achieve its No. 1 ranking for its online MBA program, Temple University today (July 9) asked Fox Dean M. Moshe Porat to resign his position. When he refused to step down, Porat was fired.

The decision to toss the dean of 22 years out of the school was made after a highly damaging independent review by the law firm of Jones Day which found numerous examples of misreported data, if not outright fraud, along with evidence of a cover-up.

U.S. News tossed Temple’s No. 1 ranked online MBA program off its ranking in January after discovering that the school misreported critical data on its program. Temple had reported that all 255 of the program’s latest incoming class submitted GMAT scores to get into the program. In fact, the school acknowledged that only 50 students, or 19.6%, submitted GMAT scores. As a result, Temple’s online MBA program, ranked first in the nation by U.S. News for four consecutive years, was moved to unranked status.

In the immediate aftermath of that embarrassment, the university hired Jones Day to conduct an investigation. In a statement issued today, Temple noted that the review is now complete and sacked an academic who had been dean of its business school since 1996. Porat joined Temple as a teaching and research assistant in 1979, for many years served as a professor of risk management until working his way up to the deanship, a job that pays more than half a million dollars a year. Now the 71-year-old administrator, the second longest-serving dean in the school’s history, is gone (see the full Jones Day report here).

‘FOX HAD IN PLACE A CONCERTED, RANKINGS-FOCUSED STRATEGY’

“It is my duty to report that the Fox School, under the leadership of Dean Moshe Porat, knowingly provided false information to at least one rankings organization about the Online MBA,” wrote Temple President Richard M. Englert. “In addition to the misreporting of the number of students who took the GMAT from 2015 to 2018, the average undergraduate GPA was overstated, and there were inaccuracies in the number of offers of admission as well as in the degree of student indebtedness.”

The Jones Day investigative team interviewed 17 Fox employees and reviewed more than 32,000 documents. It concluded  that, over the past several years, “Fox provided U.S. News with inaccurate information across multiple data metrics that are part of the publication’s OMBA rankings methodology. And while Jones Day focused on information that Fox provided to U.S. News relating to the school’s OMBA program, the investigation revealed that Fox provided U.S. News with erroneous information relating to other programs as well. On certain occasions, Fox’s reporting of inaccurate information to U.S. News was done knowingly and intentionally for the purpose of improving or maintaining Fox’s standing in the relevant U.S. News rankings (see MBA Rankings: Why Schools Are Willing To Cheat).”

The firm’s investigators discovered that Dean Porat and other Fox personnel made clear that improving or maintaining Fox’s position in rankings was a key priority.  “Fox had in place a concerted, rankings-focused strategy including detailed analyses of U.S. News’s rankings methodology and strategies tied to specific U.S. News data metrics, which strategy was promoted internally by the Dean and other Fox personnel,” the investigation found. “The environment fostered by the school’s emphasis on rankings contributed to the reporting of inaccurate information to U.S. News. Moreover, the Dean’s focus on rankings, coupled with his personal management style, caused Fox personnel who interacted with the Dean on ranking-related matters to feel pressure to perform in this regard.”

FIVE KEY FINDINGS BY JONES DAY IN ITS INVESTIGATION

The report by the law firm is damning in every way. Jones Day identifed five key findings:

1. In each year since at least 2014, Fox reported inaccurate information to U.S. News with respect to one or more data metrics, including: (a) the number of entrants who provided GMAT scores, (b) the mean undergraduate GPA of entrants, (c) the number of offers of admission extended to applicants, and (d) student-borrower indebtedness. In addition, Fox personnel adopted questionable interpretations of survey questions.

2. In various respects, Fox leadership and other employees bore responsibility for creating or promoting conditions that contributed to the reporting of inaccurate information to U.S. News and/or for the misreporting itself. Pressure to improve and maintain rankings contributed to the reporting of inaccurate information.

3. Following a change in procedure initiated by the Dean in approximately mid-2013, Fox did not establish adequate checks and balances in the process for compiling, verifying, and submitting information to U.S. News.

4. The employee principally responsible for preparing and submitting Fox’s responses to ranking surveys knowingly and intentionally misreported certain information to U.S. News and failed to correct inaccuracies with respect to other information. The investigative record is inconclusive as to whether this employee, in knowingly and intentionally misreporting information, was acting at the specific direction of any other Fox personnel.

5. There were multiple opportunities for other Fox personnel to observe and/or correct inaccuracies in information to be or that had been provided to U.S. News, but these inaccuracies were not corrected either before or after submission.

EXPLOSIVE FINDINGS PULL BACK THE CURTAIN ON THE PRESSURE RANKINGS PLACE ON DEANS

The findings pull back the curtain on the pressure that rankings place on school administrators and the temptation to cut corners to place higher on such lists. Jones Day found, for example, that beginning with Fox’s submission for U.S. News’s 2015 online MBA rankings,” the employee principally responsible for rankings surveys (i) knowingly misreported that all new program entrants had provided GMAT scores to Fox, and (ii) allegedly did so at the Dean’s direction in the presence of another employee. The Dean and the other employee deny that such direction was given.

“In addition, beginning at least as early as Fox’s survey responses submitted in 2013 for U.S. News’s 2014 Best Graduate Schools of Business rankings, the employee principally responsible for rankings surveys used various methods to inflate GPA scores of certain entrants, including increasing GPAs listed as a 1/100th value to the next highest 1/10th value (e.g., increasing 3.22 to 3.30), and then reporting the mean—or in some cases, the median—derived from these inflated values to U.S. News as part of Fox’s survey response. (The relevant U.S. News survey questions asked for the mean, rather than the median, GPA values.) Similar methods were also used to increase the mean undergraduate GPA reported to U.S. News for the 2015-2018 OMBA rankings.

“Other inaccurate information that Fox reported to U.S. News with respect to the school’s OMBA program included the number of offers of admission extended to applicants and information related to student indebtedness. For at least the 2017-2018 OMBA rankings, Fox underreported the number of offers of admission such that the reported figure was only slightly higher than the number of new entrants to the program. This resulted in inflated selectivity and matriculation rates. For U.S. News’s 2016-2018 OMBA rankings, Fox reported the average debt among all graduates, rather than only among those graduates with debt as requested by the survey question, resulting in a lower average debt figure. The investigative record is inconclusive with respect to whether this misreporting was intentional, or was instead the result of error, incompetence, or confusion about the appropriate source of data on the part of one or more Fox employees who assisted in compiling and considering the information prior to its submission to U.S. News.

About The Author

John A. Byrne is the founder and editor-in-chief of C-Change Media, publishers of Poets&Quants and four other higher education websites. He has authored or co-authored more than ten books, including two New York Times bestsellers. John is the former executive editor of Businessweek, editor-in-chief of Businessweek. com, editor-in-chief of Fast Company, and the creator of the first regularly published rankings of business schools. As the co-founder of CentreCourt MBA Festivals, he hopes to meet you at the next MBA event in-person or online.