Harvard | Mr. Harvard 2+2, Chances?
GMAT 740, GPA 3.2
Harvard | Mr. Big 4 To Healthcare Reformer
GRE 338, GPA 4.0 (1st Class Honours - UK - Deans List)
Columbia | Mr. Developing Social Enterprises
GMAT 750, GPA 3.75
Stanford GSB | Mr. Startup Guy
GMAT 760, GPA 3.3
Harvard | Mr. Overrepresented MBB Consultant (2+2)
GMAT 760, GPA 3.95
Wharton | Mr. Big Four To IB
GMAT 750, GPA 3.6
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Electric Vehicles Product Strategist
GRE 331, GPA 3.8
Rice Jones | Mr. Tech Firm Product Manager
GRE 320, GPA 2.7
Harvard | Mr. Billion Dollar Startup
GRE 309, GPA 6.75/10
Chicago Booth | Mr. Mexican Central Banker
GMAT 730, GPA 95.8/100 (1st in class)
Harvard | Mr. Comeback Kid
GMAT 770, GPA 2.8
Harvard | Mr. Tech Risk
GMAT 750, GPA 3.6
Chicago Booth | Mr. Corporate Development
GMAT 740, GPA 3.2
Wharton | Ms. Strategy & Marketing Roles
GMAT 750, GPA 9.66/10
Harvard | Mr. Bomb Squad To Business
GMAT 740, GPA 3.36
Foster School of Business | Mr. Corporate Strategy In Tech
GMAT 730, GPA 3.32
IU Kelley | Mr. Advertising Guy
GMAT 650, GPA 3.5
Duke Fuqua | Mr. IB Back Office To Front Office/Consulting
GMAT 640, GPA 2.8
Yale | Mr. Lawyer Turned Consultant
GMAT 730, GPA 3.7
Chicago Booth | Mr. Whitecoat Businessman
GMAT 740, GPA Equivalent to 3(Wes) and 3.4(scholaro)
MIT Sloan | Ms. Digital Manufacturing To Tech Innovator
GMAT 720, GPA 3.4
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Healthcare Corporate Development
GMAT 740, GPA 3.5
Yale | Mr. Education Management
GMAT 730, GPA 7.797/10
Columbia | Mr. Neptune
GMAT 750, GPA 3.65
Darden | Ms. Education Management
GRE 331, GPA 9.284/10
Columbia | Mr. Confused Consultant
GMAT 710, GPA 3.2
Harvard | Ms. 2+2 Trader
GMAT 770, GPA 3.9

2021 Business School Rankings: The Complete Collection

2021 was a historic year for MBA rankings — just not in the way you’d expect.

It started with opt-outs. In January, The Economist endured a full-on boycott of its ranking, with nearly two dozen top programs declining to participate — including every M7 program plus INSEAD and the London Business School. The Financial Times fared a little better, missing the star power of Harvard, Stanford, and Wharton (not to mention MIT Sloan and Berkeley Haas). Apparently, COVID had disrupted inputs and outputs beyond their normal bounds — at least that’s what schools wanted you to believe.

Bloomberg Businessweek was the first to adopt this posture. After canceling the 2020 ranking, the magazine’s editors spent an extra year tinkering with their model. Sure enough, when the new list came out, the ranking couldn’t be replicated, casting doubt on the results. Fortune’s foray turned into much ado about nothing, while Forbes couldn’t even produce a ranking in 2021 — despite it being a biennual affair. And who knew that misreporting rankings data could land a dean in a federal court?

IMPERFECT INSTRUMENTS

Yes, rankings matter to business schools. After all, business is a numbers-driven game, whether you’re focused on profit margins, the balance between debt and equity, or sales quotas. Rankings mean prestige — bragging rights for alumni and administrators alike. Rankings draw money and publicity — and higher-caliber students and faculty, too. Pet projects get funded and employers flock to campus. In other words, like it or not, rankings validate the most valuable of currencies to business schools: the benefit of the doubt.

Yes, rankings get a bad rap. They are subjective and sometimes lack transparency; you don’t always know what questions were asked and how they were phrased.  Sometimes, they place too much weight on inputs like GMAT scores and selectivity and outputs such as starting pay and placement. Often, this happens at the expense of the quality of teaching and support that is more difficult to quantify. Here’s the kicker: what rankings measure reflects a certain value system, one that penalizes programs whose priorities deviate from what is measured. Business school rankings can be self-reinforcing, lagging indicators of progress. At the same time, their complex methodologies can produce indexes where small differences in school scores yield wide statistically meaningless spans in numerical rankings.

In the end, however, they also enforce accountability. They act as a check against complacency, a constant motivator to schools that they — like businesses — cannot rest on reputation and laurels. Instead, they must compete, expand, and serve. For students, they are a starting point: a means to compare and a public check against deception.

Wondering where your favorite schools rank? Here are 68 stories from 2021 that help you understand which programs are surging…and why.

Editor’s Note: Be sure to look out for P&Q’s annual MBA ranking, which will be unveiled next week.

 

FINANCIAL TIMES

Financial Times 2021 MBA Ranking

The Ten Biggest Surprises In The Financial Times 2021 Global MBA Ranking

Business School Rankings Boycott Begins To Collapse For Financial Times

Financial Times Global MBA Ranking Due February 8th

 

THE ECONOMIST

The Economist’s 2021 MBA Ranking

10 Biggest Surprises In The Economist’s 2021 MBA Ranking

The Economist’s MBA Ranking: How To Parse A Ranking To Your Advantage

The Economist’s MBA Ranking To Publish January 21

 

An early cover of Fortune magazine

FORTUNE

Fortune’s 2021 Business School Ranking

5 Biggest Surprises In Fortune’s First MBA Ranking

Fortune Enters The MBA Rankings Game Trying To Reinvent The Mousetrap

 

U.S. News has long been the most influential of all the MBA rankings

U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT

US News’ 2021 MBA Program Ranking

10 Biggest Surprises In US News’ 2021 MBA Ranking

How US News Ranks Business Schools By MBA Specialization

 

PRINCETON REVIEW

MBA Ranking: Business School Culture, Curriculum & Careers

 

 

Poets&Quants Stacked Logo

POETS & QUANTS RANKINGS (2020)

Stanford Again Tops P&Q’s 2020-2021 Ranking Of The Best MBAs

INSEAD Claims First For Fifth Time In A Row

 

Next Page: Bloomberg Businessweek, Online MBAs, Entrepreneurship, Executive MBAs, Employers, Undergraduate Business Schools, and More…