The Best Business Schools For Vets


Many view military service as the world’s longest MBA prep course. Nearly everything a soldier does translate to business success.

For starters, military men and women work in teams from boot camp on. They quickly embrace the core tenet that the larger mission takes precedence over personal agendas. And they understand that any freelancing can cost lives. From the officer corps down, strategic planning isn’t viewed as a fluff exercise at some weekend retreat. It is a consequential, step-by-step process with a clear beginning and a required end. And terms like duty and accountability aren’t empty corporate mantras here. They are currency, let alone the foundation and expectations for anyone who aspires to be a leader.

Military training does more than seal the right mindset. Their experiences make returning soldiers and staffers walking case books. From clearing landmines to building supply chains, veterans have seen-and-done it all, almost always under the duress of limited resources, short timeframes, and hostile environments. As a result, their sacrifice and can-do spirit raises the bar in every MBA classroom.


Still, the transition from active service to MBA student can be a rocky one. Some have spent years away from an academic setting. Others are already providers for families and hold down jobs. As a result, they require a flexible scheduling and support system that goes above-and-beyond what most MBA programs traditionally offer.

To accommodate these variables, veterans must factor in a different set of metrics when choosing the right business school for them. To help with that process, The Military Times has been producing a “Best for Vets” ranking of business schools for the past four years.

It is certainly coming out at the right time. The Military Times reports that military veterans represented 17% of graduate business students in 2015, up from 13% the previous year. And the military’s influence on business programs is more pronounced than ever. And this influence extends far beyond the classroom. As part of its rankings, The Military Times surveyed over 180 graduate business programs. Over a third – 38% — have someone with military ties among its leadership.

Here’s how the rankings work. The Military Times evaluates graduate business programs in five categories: School culture, student support, academic quality, academic policies, and cost and financial aid. However, the publication is careful to note that the “university culture and student support counted the most, and financial aid counted the least.”

That said, The Military Times ranking struggles to pass the smell test. For one, it comes with an air of mystery, with editorial noting that “many factors other than those listed in the chart were considered to develop the rankings.” Even more, The Military Times failed to list exactly what those factors were, making it sometimes difficult why some programs, especially those with fewer veteran students. It is a head scratcher to say the very least.

Even more, the list fails to include highly ranked MBA programs. Take the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business, a yellow ribbon participant,where 7%-9% of incoming MBAs are veterans. The program includes everything from military scholarships to the Darden Military Association (DMA) club, which handles everything from networking with alumni to sponsoring speakers. The program even offers military leadership electives. As a result, readers should look at this ranking as a starting point — one with several holes.


For the second consecutive year, the University of Nebraska at Omaha has topped The Military Times’ list. So what makes the University of Nebraska-Omaha the best graduate business program for veterans? It isn’t a particularly large program, with military members comprising just 19 of the 386 students enrolled there. Compared to Arizona State, which has 271 military members out of 1,381 students or Indiana University (130 out of 1,505 students), Nebraska-Omaha boasts a relatively small military footprint.

However, the program offers strong financial support to veterans. For one, the program is at or below the TA cap, which means the program’s per credit cost did not exceed the military’s tuition assistance cap of $250 per hour in the 2014-2015 school year. Nebraska-Omaha also received four stars for its Yellow Ribbon participation, meaning the school either “partially or completely make(s) up the difference between a school’s tuition rate and the amount covered by the Post-9/11 GI Bill.” In addition, the program earned the highest scores, four stars, for its staff support and academic support. Along with support, students enjoy a lower entry requirement, with the average GMAT being 498 for the student population overall.

Eastern Kentucky University somehow ranked second, despite only enrolling four military veterans. Rutgers rounded out the top three, offering the most diverse range of MBA programs – full-time, part-time, executive, joint, and online – to veterans. Like Nebraska-Omaha, Rutgers can tout four star ratings in staff and academic support. It also reported that no veteran was charged a tuition rate above what was covered in the Post-9/11 GI Bill.


Arizona State (6th), Ohio State (8th), and Texas A&M (9th) were the most recognizable MBA brands in The Military Times’ Top 10 programs. Ohio State actually produced a 100% graduation rate among veterans (with Texas A&M and Arizona State following closely at 98% and 93% respectively). All three programs also scored four star ratings in terms of academic support, as well as keeping tuition at or below what’s covered in the Post-9/11 GI Bill (with Ohio State staying at or below the TA cap as well). Among the schools, Texas A&M boasted the highest military retention rate at 90%.

Overall, Syracuse University, which slipped from 2nd to 5th in The Military Times ranking, had the highest entry hurdle among Top 20 programs, with students coming in with an average GMAT of 657. Like Rutgers, the University of Kansas came out of nowhere, notching a 4th place ranking, which was buoyed by a top flight yellow ribbon program and four star staff and academic support for veterans.  Both Florida State and the University of the Incarnate Word tumbled out of the this year’s Top 10 (with the former’s fall likely due to not participating in the survey).

Overall, the largest concentration of military veterans in the upper echelon of the ranking are found at Bellevue University (328), Arizona State (271), Park University (195), and the University of Southern California (151).

Go to next page to see ranking information on the top 20 programs for military veterans.

  • Danny

    I could not agree more that this list, and whatever analysis Military Times conducted, is absolutely absurd. Most of the schools on the list have quite regular ads in Military Times. The unfortunate reality is that many individuals will not do their own due diligence and research MBA programs; instead they will default to what looks good in a low-rate periodical. It really is a shame!
    As a military member looking forward to retirement and working in the public/private sectors, the last place I would look for MBA guidance would be the Military Times.

  • C. Taylor

    The GMAT scores listed are not accurate. USC-Marshall has a median score of 690. ASU, has an average score of 672. Syracuse has an average of 626. These are the ones I checked.

    That said, it is hard to justify attending a program that DOES have a GMAT average of below 600. This indicates the applicants are either not putting effort into the GMAT, or that their fundamentals are lacking–which is fixable with effort in GMAT prep. Neither of these are conducive to a quality experience.

    USC-Marshall is a first-rate program. Considering the pro-veteran aspect in terms of overall fit + quality is advisable.

  • Jonathan Cobb

    Vanderbilt Owen should be on this list. They have truly rolled out the red carpet for veterans and their culture is outstanding.

    I would like to see a poetsandquants MBA ranking for vets that takes satisfaction into account. Financing an MBA is important, and the Yellow Ribbon program is an important factor, but the ROI of an MBA for veterans has little to do with the tuition assistance rate.

  • Kevin Luby

    As a veteran that is finishing a MBA, this list is nonsensical. You have schools here that aren’t even accredited by the AACSB. Also, these schools rate higher based on giving ACE credit for military service. The best B-schools for military are simply the best b-schools.

  • Johnny Knoxville

    Dumbest post I’ve seen on this website. As a veteran who will be matriculating into H/S/W this Fall, I can say that the best MBA programs for veterans are simply the best MBA programs. I don’t even recognize half the schools on this garbage list.

  • Yut

    Current MBA and vet; couldn’t agree with you more, this ranking is suspect. I’ll put this PSA first: vets if you’re out there and interested in an MBA, google ANY M7 vets group and reach out. They all have awesome groups and I talked to many of them as an applicant. Even if you don’t want to go there or don’t thank you are competitive, reach out. We’ll help regardless, trust me.

    Back to my soapbox, I think it’s somewhat misleading to credit schools for setting up strong systems for GI Bill use. Yes they are making it easier for vets to come to school there, but the other side of that coin, and one that I fear manifests itself far too often, is that they are making a business decision to recruit students with guaranteed financing. I’ve seen far too many guys and gals get sucked into useless degree programs by marketing devices only to end up wasting their time and money for little or no return.

    Granted, not everybody is going to find a home in the top 25, but the “best” school for vets is the “best” school for everbody else, by and large. We’re all competing for the same jobs. And just so we’re clear, if you are 100% GI bill eligible and your school contributes Yellow Ribbon benefits, your tuition bill before stipends is going to be $20k or less (I pay <$10k at an M7 school not mentioned on this list).

  • Top MBA Grad

    John, if you agree then why is your site publishing and amplifying potentially misleading information.

    A lot of Vets have been screwed by many for-profit universities feeding off the GI bill, and no doubt choosing a second rate MBA based on this information could also be potentially damaging.

    As you say in the article, “The Military Times ranking has its drawbacks. For one, it comes with an air of mystery…” Why not further investigate how the ranking is constructed to see if there are obvious faults, rather than just adding a one sentence disclaimer buried towards the end of the piece.

  • I couldn’t agree more.

  • Mike

    I agree 100% man. The list is garbage.

  • MBA 15

    Basically, Tuck, Yale, Duke, Michigan, Cornell gain a little in vet rankings compared to a normal MBA ranking due to their veteran friendly yellow ribbon contributions. The strongest and largest vet clubs are at HBS and Wharton, however.

    Bottom line: get into the best school that will give you the tools and network (veteran-centric or not) to help you find and transition into your ideal post-MBA job in your chosen. Period.

    Going to a shooting range in Omaha (with classmates with 490 GMAT scores) doesn’t sound like a very smart idea… ?

  • Mil-to-Biz

    As a military member looking to transition to the private sector through an MBA, this ranking makes zero sense. With programs like Darden, Ross, Kenan-Flagler, and McCombs that are basically free under the GI Bill and other schools like Tuck, Fuqua, and Yale SOM that are nearly free with the Yellow Ribbon program, I’m not sure how Nebraska-Omaha or Eastern Kentucky are better choices. It’s possible that some veteran’s wouldn’t have the GI Bill available to them, but attending an MBA program part-time while on active duty using the the Tuition Assistance program does not seem like a great way to get the most out of an MBA. A number of top 50 programs have 5% to 10% veteran enrollment, as well as active veteran’s clubs that offer help and advice to prospective students. At the end of the day, a military member should be looking for the best value (cost balanced with quality), and this ranking doesn’t seem to take the GI Bill or Yellow Ribbon program into account at all. Garbage in, garbage out…the Military Times is missing a huge piece of the equation here, in my opinion.