Freedom, not money or power, is what drew Fei Du toward academia. In a conversation with John A. Byrne for Poets&Quants’ Faculty Spotlight series, the Gies College of Business professor of accountancy describes a formative moment early in her career. A mentor once framed life as a triangle of three forces: freedom, power, and money. You can maximize one while holding the other two constant. Du knew instinctively which point mattered most to her. Intellectual freedom, the ability to ask questions about how the world works and why organizations behave the way they do, was the prize.

Accounting itself was, by her own admission, something of a happy accident. Growing up in China, she says, certain professions were viewed as especially suitable and respectable career paths, particularly for women. Accounting was one of them. Her parents encouraged the choice. Yet once she began studying it, the fit felt natural. She discovered that financial statements were not static reports but coded narratives. Every managerial decision leaves a trace in the accounting system. Learning to read those traces felt like detective work.

That investigative lens shapes her teaching. Du specializes in data analytics within accountancy and uses real market events to challenge students’ assumptions. Consider the contrasting stock market reactions when Pfizer and BioNTech announced their COVID vaccine breakthrough. Many students initially expect both companies to benefit equally. A closer look at their financial structures and business models reveals why the smaller, more concentrated BioNTech experienced a sharper market response. For Du, moments like this demonstrate that accounting is not about mechanical calculation. It is about interpreting economic reality.

Her research similarly probes beneath surface assumptions. In her doctoral work, Du examined political connections in China’s bond market, finding that firms with strong political ties often secured more favorable financing. Yet those ties could become liabilities if political winds shifted. Social capital, she argues, is powerful but fragile.

More recently, she has studied promotion systems inside firms. Organizations tend to focus on winners in corporate tournaments, celebrating those who advance. Du instead asks what happens to those who are passed over. Her findings suggest that high-performing employees who narrowly miss promotion often experience the sharpest decline in motivation and are more likely to leave within a few years. Transparent systems and carefully designed compensation structures can mitigate that effect. The broader lesson is that internal management controls shape behavior in ways that extend beyond simple sorting mechanisms.

In the classroom, Du confronts a common misconception that accounting is purely technical. Students often believe their job is to “get the numbers right” and stop there. She pushes them further. Correct numbers are only the starting point. The real work is contextualizing those numbers, benchmarking them, and translating them into insight. That is the difference between a number cruncher and a decision maker.

Artificial intelligence, in her view, accelerates that transition. AI can handle much of the mechanical work, generating correlation matrices or running code in minutes. Freed from the grind, students can spend more time on interpretation and data storytelling. The harder questions, she notes, rarely arrive neatly packaged in a text box.

Asked to imagine the future of business education, Du envisions greater flexibility. Some courses might scale to thousands. Others might shrink to a dozen students working closely with a professor over time. Heterogeneous class sizes and schedules, she suggests, could foster both access and deep relationships. If intellectual freedom drew her to academia, designing environments that nurture it may be her lasting contribution.

Listen to the full conversation here: https://www.buzzsprout.com/221123/episodes/18666517

© Copyright 2026 Poets & Quants. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Poets & Quants, please submit your request HERE.