Online MBA Ranking | How Graduates Rate Their Programs For Learning Experience by: Kristy Bleizeffer on December 16, 2024 | 2,255 Views December 16, 2024 Copy Link Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email Share on LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp Share on Reddit FORMAT SATISFACTION This section includes responses to three survey questions focusing on program format: Level of satisfaction with the program’s synchronous (or live) sessions, satisfaction with the asynchronous content, and satisfaction with the program’s flexibility. Many online MBA programs have a blend of synchronous classes (live online) with asynchronous recorded videos which students can watch on their own time. The two tables below show how alumni at each school rated their satisfaction with both aspects of their program. Rate your level of satisfaction with the synchronous (live) sessions. Question Rank School Satisfaction 1 University of Utah (Eccles) 10.0 2 Hofstra University (Zarb) 9.9 3 Auburn University (Harbert) 9.8 3 Indiana University (Kelley) 9.8 3 University of Michigan (Ross) 9.8 3 University of Washington (Foster) 9.8 7 Baylor University (Hankamer) 9.7 7 Rice University (Jones) 9.7 7 University of Connecticut School of Business 9.7 10 North Carolina State University (Poole) 9.6 10 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga 9.6 12 Lehigh University 9.5 12 Syracuse University (Whitman) 9.5 12 University of Massachusetts at Amherst (Isenberg) 9.5 12 University of North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler) 9.5 12 Worcester Polytechnic Institute 9.5 17 Carnegie Mellon University (Tepper) 9.4 17 Jack Welch Management Institute 9.4 17 Villanova University 9.4 20 Creighton University (Heider) 9.3 20 Santa Clara University (Leavey) 9.3 20 Southern Methodist University (Cox) 9.3 20 University of Florida (Warrington) 9.3 20 University of Iowa (Tippie) 9.3 20 University of North Texas (Ryan) 9.3 20 University of Texas at Dallas (Jindal) 9.3 27 Florida International University 9.2 27 University of Maryland (Smith) 9.2 27 University of South Florida (Muma) 9.2 30 American University (Kogod) 9.1 30 Pepperdine University (Graziadio) 9.1 30 University of Delaware (Lerner) 9.1 30 University of Southern California (Marshall) 9.1 34 San Jose State University (Lucas) 9.0 34 Texas Tech (Rawls) 9.0 36 Clemson University 8.9 36 Fairfield University (Dolan) 8.9 36 George Mason University (Costello) 8.9 36 University of Denver (Daniels) 8.9 36 William & Mary (Mason) 8.9 41 Bryant University 8.8 41 University of California, Davis 8.8 41 University of Nebraska-Lincoln 8.8 41 Wake Forest University 8.8 45 Louisiana State University (Ourso) 8.7 45 Ohio University 8.7 47 Drexel University (LeBow) 8.6 48 Bowling Green State University (Schmidthorst) 8.5 48 University of Massachusetts-Lowell 8.5 50 University of Michigan-Dearborn 8.3 50 University of Wisconsin MBA Consortium 8.3 52 SUNY Oswego 7.7 53 University of Cincinnati (Lindner) 7.4 54 University of Missouri (Trulaske) 7.3 55 Kennesaw State University (Coles) 7.2 56 Seattle University (Albers) 5.0 57 Rogers State University 0.0 Rate your satisfaction with the asynchronous content. Question Rank School Satisfaction 1 Hofstra University (Zarb) 9.9 1 North Carolina State University (Poole) 9.9 1 University of Utah (Eccles) 9.9 4 Auburn University (Harbert) 9.7 4 Indiana University (Kelley) 9.7 4 University of Washington (Foster) 9.7 4 Wake Forest University 9.7 8 Jack Welch Management Institute 9.6 8 Rice University (Jones) 9.6 8 University of Massachusetts at Amherst (Isenberg) 9.6 8 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga 9.6 8 William & Mary (Mason) 9.6 13 University of Texas at Dallas (Jindal) 9.5 14 Carnegie Mellon University (Tepper) 9.4 14 Creighton University (Heider) 9.4 14 University of Delaware (Lerner) 9.4 14 University of Michigan (Ross) 9.4 14 Villanova University 9.4 19 Baylor University (Hankamer) 9.3 19 Santa Clara University (Leavey) 9.3 19 University of Connecticut School of Business 9.3 19 University of Florida (Warrington) 9.3 19 University of Missouri (Trulaske) 9.3 19 University of South Florida (Muma) 9.3 19 Worcester Polytechnic Institute 9.3 26 Bryant University 9.2 26 University of North Texas (Ryan) 9.2 28 Florida International University 9.1 28 Lehigh University 9.1 28 SUNY Oswego 9.1 28 University of Iowa (Tippie) 9.1 28 University of North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler) 9.1 28 University of Southern California (Marshall) 9.1 34 American University (Kogod) 9.0 34 Southern Methodist University (Cox) 9.0 34 Texas Tech (Rawls) 9.0 34 University of Michigan-Dearborn 9.0 38 Drexel University (LeBow) 8.9 38 Louisiana State University (Ourso) 8.9 38 Syracuse University (Whitman) 8.9 38 University of Maryland (Smith) 8.9 38 University of Nebraska-Lincoln 8.9 38 University of Wisconsin MBA Consortium 8.9 44 Bowling Green State University (Schmidthorst) 8.8 44 University of Cincinnati (Lindner) 8.8 44 University of Massachusetts-Lowell 8.8 47 Ohio University 8.7 48 Pepperdine University (Graziadio) 8.6 48 Seattle University (Albers) 8.6 50 Rogers State University 8.5 51 San Jose State University (Lucas) 8.4 51 University of California, Davis 8.4 51 University of Denver (Daniels) 8.4 54 George Mason University (Costello) 8.3 55 Clemson University 8.2 56 Fairfield University (Dolan) 8.1 56 Kennesaw State University (Coles) 8.1 FLEXIBILITY Flexibility in an online MBA program is fairly expected. But some schools are better at doing it than others, according to their recent grads. This year, four alumni at four schools rated their satisfaction with the programs’ flexibility as perfect 10s: Hofstra University (Zarb), University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, University of Utah (Eccles) and Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Rate your satisfaction with the program’s flexibility. Question Rank School Satisfaction 1 Hofstra University (Zarb) 10.0 1 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga 10.0 1 University of Utah (Eccles) 10.0 1 Worcester Polytechnic Institute 10.0 5 Creighton University (Heider) 9.9 5 Rice University (Jones) 9.9 5 Syracuse University (Whitman) 9.9 5 University of Connecticut School of Business 9.9 9 Jack Welch Management Institute 9.8 9 University of Denver (Daniels) 9.8 9 University of Michigan (Ross) 9.8 9 University of Texas at Dallas (Jindal) 9.8 13 University of Delaware (Lerner) 9.7 13 University of Massachusetts at Amherst (Isenberg) 9.7 13 Villanova University 9.7 13 Wake Forest University 9.7 17 Baylor University (Hankamer) 9.6 17 Bryant University 9.6 17 Drexel University (LeBow) 9.6 17 Indiana University (Kelley) 9.6 17 North Carolina State University (Poole) 9.6 17 University of Iowa (Tippie) 9.6 17 University of Michigan-Dearborn 9.6 17 University of Nebraska-Lincoln 9.6 17 University of Washington (Foster) 9.6 26 Auburn University (Harbert) 9.5 26 Louisiana State University (Ourso) 9.5 26 University of Florida (Warrington) 9.5 26 William & Mary (Mason) 9.5 30 American University (Kogod) 9.4 30 Bowling Green State University (Schmidthorst) 9.4 30 Lehigh University 9.4 30 University of North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler) 9.4 30 University of South Florida (Muma) 9.4 35 Florida International University 9.3 35 Southern Methodist University (Cox) 9.3 37 Carnegie Mellon University (Tepper) 9.2 37 Fairfield University (Dolan) 9.2 37 Santa Clara University (Leavey) 9.2 37 University of Cincinnati (Lindner) 9.2 37 University of Massachusetts-Lowell 9.2 42 Ohio University 9.1 42 Texas Tech (Rawls) 9.1 42 University of California, Davis 9.1 45 University of Maryland (Smith) 9.0 45 University of North Texas (Ryan) 9.0 47 Clemson University 8.9 47 Kennesaw State University (Coles) 8.9 47 University of Missouri (Trulaske) 8.9 47 University of Wisconsin MBA Consortium 8.9 51 University of Southern California (Marshall) 8.8 52 Pepperdine University (Graziadio) 8.7 53 SUNY Oswego 8.6 54 Rogers State University 8.5 55 George Mason University (Costello) 8.4 55 San Jose State University (Lucas) 8.4 57 Seattle University (Albers) 7.8 More alumni data on the student experience: PAGE 2: WOULD RECOMMEND PAGE 3: FORMAT SATISFACTION PAGE 4: QUALITY OF PROFESSORS PAGE 5: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING PAGE 6: APPLYING LESSONS AT WORK PAGE 7: MAKING CONNECTIONS Previous Page Continue ReadingPage 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 © Copyright 2025 Poets & Quants. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Poets & Quants, please submit your request HERE.