INSEAD Tops Financial Times Ranking

The 2016 Financial Times Global MBA Ranking

2016 Rank & School	2015 Rank	Change	Weighted Salary	Pay Change
26. CUHK	30	+4	$124,268	120%
27. Virginia (Darden)	32	+5	$147,104	109%
28. Oxford (Said)	22	-6	$136,959	81%
29. Indian School of Business	33	+4	$138,454	142%
29. Nanyang Business School	40	+11	$119,032	105%
31. Cornell (Johnson)	28	-3	$142,764	102%
32. National University of Singapore	31	-1	$115,148	121%
33. Carnegie Mellon (Tepper)	36	+3	$136,996	108%
34. UCLA (Anderson)	25	+9	$140,067	89%
35. Imperial Business School	34	-1	$112,301	83%
35. Lancaster	50	+15	$106,638	111%
37. City University (Cass)	45	+8	$121,402	82%
38. Manchester Business School	35	-3	$117,918	96%
39. Shanghai Jiao Tong	55	+16	$113,340	168%
40. The Lisbon MBA	36	-4	$123,584	100%
41. North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler)	39	-2	$128,240	97%
42. Rotterdam (Erasmus)	45	+3	$107,998	81%
43. Renmin University of China	NR	—–	$94,233	163%
44. University of Hong Kong	28	-16	$112,518	106%
44. Georgetown (McDonough)	42	-2	$130,950	95%
46. Warwick Business School	38	-8	$112,287	70%
47. Texas-Austin (McCombs)	40	-7	$134,317	92%
47. Fudan University	55	+8	$96,884	170%
49. Washington (Foster)	51	+2	$120,279	87%
49. Mannheim	55	+6	$109,622	79%

Source: The Financial Times

Questions about this article? Email us or leave a comment below.