Wharton | Mr. Big Four To IB
GMAT 750, GPA 3.6
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Electric Vehicles Product Strategist
GRE 331, GPA 3.8
Harvard | Mr. Overrepresented MBB Consultant (2+2)
GMAT 760, GPA 3.95
Stanford GSB | Mr. Startup Guy
GMAT 760, GPA 3.3
Rice Jones | Mr. Tech Firm Product Manager
GRE 320, GPA 2.7
Harvard | Mr. Billion Dollar Startup
GRE 309, GPA 6.75/10
Chicago Booth | Mr. Mexican Central Banker
GMAT 730, GPA 95.8/100 (1st in class)
Harvard | Mr. Comeback Kid
GMAT 770, GPA 2.8
Harvard | Mr. Tech Risk
GMAT 750, GPA 3.6
Chicago Booth | Mr. Corporate Development
GMAT 740, GPA 3.2
Wharton | Ms. Strategy & Marketing Roles
GMAT 750, GPA 9.66/10
Harvard | Mr. Bomb Squad To Business
GMAT 740, GPA 3.36
Harvard | Mr. Big 4 To Healthcare Reformer
GRE 338, GPA 4.0 (1st Class Honours - UK - Deans List)
Foster School of Business | Mr. Corporate Strategy In Tech
GMAT 730, GPA 3.32
IU Kelley | Mr. Advertising Guy
GMAT 650, GPA 3.5
Duke Fuqua | Mr. IB Back Office To Front Office/Consulting
GMAT 640, GPA 2.8
Yale | Mr. Lawyer Turned Consultant
GMAT 730, GPA 3.7
Chicago Booth | Mr. Whitecoat Businessman
GMAT 740, GPA Equivalent to 3(Wes) and 3.4(scholaro)
MIT Sloan | Ms. Digital Manufacturing To Tech Innovator
GMAT 720, GPA 3.4
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Healthcare Corporate Development
GMAT 740, GPA 3.5
Columbia | Mr. Developing Social Enterprises
GMAT 750, GPA 3.75
Yale | Mr. Education Management
GMAT 730, GPA 7.797/10
Columbia | Mr. Neptune
GMAT 750, GPA 3.65
Darden | Ms. Education Management
GRE 331, GPA 9.284/10
Columbia | Mr. Confused Consultant
GMAT 710, GPA 3.2
Harvard | Ms. 2+2 Trader
GMAT 770, GPA 3.9
Harvard | Mr Big 4 To IB
GRE 317, GPA 4.04/5.00

At Ross, Business As Usual, With Tweaks

Ross School of Business. Courtesy photo

Ross School of Business. Courtesy photo

For the second year in a row, applications were up at the University of Michigan Ross School of Business. Just not as much in the second year as in the first.

Applications for the 2016-2017 year rose 5%, a healthy increase compared to many of Ross’s peer schools, but dwarfed by last year’s 31% increase, says Soojin Kwon, director of admissions. The smaller jump didn’t trouble school officials at all, she says.

“We were happy to see a second consecutive year of an increase in apps,” Kwon says, “especially in light of the large increase we saw last year and the small increases — or declines, in some cases — we saw among some of our peers.”


Breaking down the makeup of applicants to Ross, Kwon says there was at least one notable shift: “We had a healthy increase in apps from the U.S. and Latin America and a decline in apps from Asia.” She adds that little else will likely change this year, with class size expected to remain around 410 and no major changes planned for the admissions process. Scholarship offers rose, Kwon says.

“The increase in apps from Latin America was largely from Brazil, where the economy is weak. It’s common to see a rise in apps when an economy is weak,” Kwon says. “Regarding Asia, we’ve heard from many peers that they, too, have seen a drop in apps from Asia.”

She says Ross has made a pair of small adjustments to its two essay questions. The first now reads (changes in italics): “What are you most proud of outside of your professional life? How does it shape who you are today (up to 400 words).” The second question, “What is your desired career path and why?” has been given a limit of 250 words.

“We have an annual meeting to discuss potential changes to the application,” Kwon says. “The AdComm assesses whether we were able to glean the insights needed to determine whether an applicant has the skills and traits we’re looking for. The primary areas for review are essay questions, interview process, and interview questions. This year, we tweaked the essay questions. The last major change in our admissions process was a few years ago when we introduced the Team Exercise.”


Kwon says the 2016-2017 year is shaping up to be business as usual, with a pair of possible caveats: More women applied, and more applicants are expressing a desire to work in some of the fields that were traditionally on the lower end of the pay scale — perhaps an indicator that money is not foremost on many applicants’ minds.

“We didn’t see any major differences in applicants’ backgrounds. We did see an increase in apps from women and expect to have more women in this year’s incoming class,” Kwon says.

“We did see some changes in applicants’ career goals, with more intending to pursue careers in social impact, tech, and health care.”