Tuck | Mr. First Gen Student
GMAT 740, GPA 3.0
Columbia | Mr. Global Healthcare
GMAT 740, GPA 4.0
Stanford GSB | Mr. Airline Developer
GMAT 710 (planning a retake), GPA 3.48
Harvard | Mr. First Gen Consultant
GMAT 710, GPA 4.0 (First Class Honours)
Harvard | Mr. Big 4 Auditor
GMAT 740, GPA 3.55
Stanford GSB | Mr. JD Explorer
GRE 340, GPA 3.5
Georgetown McDonough | Mr. Automotive Project Manager
GMAT 680, GPA 3.5
NYU Stern | Mr. Honor Roll Student
GRE 320, GPA 3.1
Stanford GSB | Ms. Healthtech Venture
GMAT 720, GPA 3.5
Chicago Booth | Mr. Bank AVP
GRE 322, GPA 3.22
UCLA Anderson | Ms. Apparel Entrepreneur
GMAT 690, GPA 3.2
MIT Sloan | Mr. AI & Robotics
GMAT 750, GPA 3.7
Tuck | Mr. Liberal Arts Military
GMAT 680, GPA 2.9
Stanford GSB | Mr. Social Entrepreneur
GRE 328, GPA 3.0
Wharton | Mr. Industry Switch
GMAT 760, GPA 3.95
Stanford GSB | Mr. Irish Consultant
GMAT 710, GPA 3.7
McCombs School of Business | Mr. Marine Executive Officer
GRE 322, GPA 3.28
Harvard | Ms. Developing Markets
GMAT 780, GPA 3.63
Harvard | Mr. Policy Player
GMAT 750, GPA 3.4
Wharton | Mr. Future Non-Profit
GMAT 720, GPA 8/10
Duke Fuqua | Mr. Tough Guy
GMAT 680, GPA 3.3
Harvard | Mr. CPPIB Strategy
GRE 329 (Q169 V160), GPA 3.6
Harvard | Mr. Defense Engineer
GMAT 730, GPA 3.6
Chicago Booth | Mr. Unilever To MBB
GRE 308, GPA 3.8
Kellogg | Mr. Double Whammy
GMAT 730, GPA 7.1/10
Stanford GSB | Mr. Infantry Officer
GRE 320, GPA 3.7
McCombs School of Business | Mr. Ernst & Young
GMAT 600 (hopeful estimate), GPA 3.86

Small Progress For Women MBA Founders

Rent the Runway’s Jennifer Fleiss (left) and Jennifer Hyman

When Jennifer Hyman and Jennifer Fleiss met as sectionmates at Harvard Business School about a decade ago, they had no idea what the two of them would eventually create together. But soon after meeting the two began regularly meeting to discuss potential startup ideas, and by the time they graduated in 2009, they had successfully launched Rent the Runway, a designer clothing online platform. Nearly 10 years later, Rent the Runway has opened brick-and-mortar shops in five U.S. cities, collected about $126 million in venture capital investments, and, at the end of 2016, received about a $600 million valuation. Once on the Poets&Quants Top MBA Startups list, they’ve also inadvertently spawned at least two other women-founded teams currently on our 2018 ranking.

Both Jordana Kier and Kelsey Doorey spent time working at Rent the Runway, and the experience led both to founding their own companies years later. For Kier, a Columbia Business School MBA graduate, it was LOLA, which she founded alongside Wharton School grad Alexandra Friedman. And for Doorey, a UCLA Anderson School of Management grad, it was Vow to be Chic. With a current funding level of $11.2 million and $10 million, both LOLA and Vow to be Chic claimed spots on this year’s and last year’s Top MBA Startups list.

The two businesses represent a small — and not necessarily growing — population of startups with women founders to make the P&Q list, which is based solely on venture capital raised within the past five years. This year, nine of the 100 top MBA startups were comprised of women-only founding teams, while another 13 startups had at least one woman on the founding team. This means that 78 of the 100 MBA startups ranked by Poets&Quants were founded by male-only teams. And while the nine women-only founding teams is a slight uptick from last year’s eight, the number of Top MBA Startups with coed teams dipped from 15 last year to the 13 this year.

MBA STARTUPS REFLECTING OVERALL MARKET TRENDS

Denver-based Guild Education was the women-founded startup to rank highest on this year’s list, at 18th, raising $31.5 million. The Stanford Graduate School of Business team launched its business in 2015, offering education and tuition reimbursements for working adults. It raised a $21 million Series B round last September. Following Guild closely in the rankings is Columbia Business School-founded Away, which raised $31 million and placed 19th. The luggage brand had a similar Series B round, raising $20 million last May. All told, the nine women-founded companies on this year’s list raised a combined $137.74 million of the $2.455 billion raised by all 100 ranked MBA startups.

Compared to the U.S. national rate of women-owned businesses, these numbers are low. According to an economic report published by Women Impacting Public Policy last March, women own nearly 10 million businesses in the U.S. Those firms make up nearly 37% of all non-farm businesses across the country. However, the report also states, less than 10% of those firms employ people than just the founder. This largely comes down to funding, other research says. Male-founded firms start with double the capital, and what’s more, the same report says, there are “large gender gaps in the amounts of financing across all firms, high growth potential firms, and even the top ranking firms by employment.”

The problem is a persistent and well-known one. There simply aren’t enough women making venture capital decisions. According to a Pitchbook analysis conducted by Fortune and published in April 2016, women make up about 6% of decision-makers at U.S. venture capital firms. As of March 2017, the gender gap among VC investments was actually getting worse as women-founded and -owned companies collected $1.46 billion compared to $58.2 billion raised by male-founded and owned companies.