What Business Schools Can Learn From Modern Marketing’s Shift To Lifetime Value 

Business schools still manage admissions like it is 2005.

Awareness. 

Engagement. 

Application. 

Enrollment.

Fill the class. Report the yield. Start again next cycle.

But in the corporate world, marketing has fundamentally changed. Leading companies no longer optimize for transactions. They optimize for lifetime value.

Higher education is now facing the same reckoning.

The student journey increasingly mirrors the modern customer journey. The institutions that recognize this shift and redesign around it will define the next era of graduate management education.

FROM FUNNEL TO FLYWHEEL

Traditional marketing funnels assume a linear relationship. Prospects move step by step toward a purchase. Once the transaction occurs, the journey is largely complete.

Leading companies now think in flywheels, not funnels. The relationship does not end at purchase. It compounds through retention, cross engagement, advocacy, and community.

Higher education is undergoing the same shift. At the heart of this shift is wider recognition that lifelong learning is the key driver of transformation and future readiness for individuals and organizations.

The traditional model for university marketeers treated enrollment as the finish line. It should be viewed as the starting point.

Prospect to Student to Alumni to Advocate to Prospect again, and if you got the journey so far right, Referrer and an active member of your ecosystem. This happens when alumni mentor candidates recruit graduates from your programs or return for executive education and potentially bring their team or organization, making the journey becomes circular. The value of each individual extends far beyond their initial tuition.

The real metric is not enrollment volume. It is Student Lifetime Value.

NOT ALL CUSTOMERS OR STUDENTS ARE EQUAL

In marketing, companies recognize that not all customers create equal long-term value. Some disengage quickly. Others become loyal advocates and repeat buyers.

The same is true in higher education.

Not all students contribute equally to alumni engagement, career outcomes, employer relationships, brand equity, philanthropy or university board positions.

Similarly, not all moments in a journey matter equally.

In marketing, behavioral signals rather than demographics alone determine where to invest resources to attract the best customers. Engagement patterns, intent signals, and predictive modeling shape decision making in forward-looking marketing teams.

Admissions and student services should apply the same logic.

Rather than treating all prospects identically, schools can model intent strength, program fit, probability of persistence, and long-term alumni engagement potential.

This is not about exclusion. It is about precision.

AI AS THE NEW MARKETING BRAIN

Modern marketing relies on AI driven systems that model behavior and probability at scale.

These systems understand language and intent. They generate personalized content and conversations. They predict next best actions. They continuously refine profiles based on engagement.

They do not model truth. They model likelihood.

In the context of graduate education, this changes how schools approach recruitment and engagement.

Instead of static segmentation based on geography, test scores or job title, AI enables dynamic persona modeling based on behavioral signals.

Imagine an always on candidacy model.

Prospects are matched to programs based on evolving intent. Content is delivered at the right moment in their decision process. Conversational AI advisors reduce uncertainty. Friction is removed before it becomes a dropout risk.

Different students. Different journeys. By design.

The parallel to customer journey orchestration is unmistakable.

FROM CAMPAIGN CYCLES TO CONTINUOUS ENGAGEMENT

Traditional admissions marketing operates in bursts tied to application deadlines, campus visits, and email campaigns.

Modern marketing is continuous, adaptive, and responsive.

Business schools can adopt the same mindset.

Instead of thinking in terms of one annual recruitment season, schools can build systems that monitor behavioral signals across channels, adjust messaging in real time, and support students during transitions from admit to matriculation, from classroom to internship, and from graduation to career pivot and growth.

The journey does not pause between milestones. It evolves.

Institutional engagement must evolve with it.

THE ORGANIZATIONAL CHALLENGE

In corporations, the shift to lifetime value required organizational change. Marketing, sales, finance, technology, product, and customer success had to align around shared metrics.

Higher education faces a similar challenge.

AI cannot fix broken alignment and siloed mentalities.

If admissions optimize for yield, career services for placement speed, alumni relations for event attendance and community connectiveness, and advancement for annual giving but no function has a shared view of student lifetime value, the system fragments.

Data silos compound the problem. Incentives anchored in short term performance undermine long term strategy.

Technology alone is insufficient.

The move from enrollment metrics to lifetime value demands governance redesign, cross functional collaboration, and new definitions of success.

EDUCATION BECOMES ADAPTIVE

The parallel extends beyond recruitment into the learning experience itself.

Just as consumer brands personalize offers and recommendations, AI allows institutions to personalize skill development pathways, career preparation resources, interview coaching, alumni learning opportunities, and executive education touchpoints.

Education becomes adaptive, not standardized.

The MBA ceases to be a two-year product and becomes a lifelong copilot.

In marketing, brands that win are those that remain relevant across life stages.

Business schools face the same imperative.

THE STRATEGIC INFLECTION POINT

Marketing’s evolution from transaction to lifetime value transformed how companies operate.

Graduate education is at a similar inflection point.

The question for business schools is not whether to adopt AI tools.

It is whether they will continue to optimize for enrollment or redesign their institutions around enduring relationships.

The schools that understand the student journey as a lifelong customer journey will not simply fill classes.

They will build ecosystems.

In a competitive market defined by demographic shifts and rising candidate expectations, that difference will matter more than ever.

---

Benjamin Stevenin is former Director of Business School Solutions and Partnerships at Times Higher Education. Sarah Toms is Chief Innovation Officer at IMD Business School in Lausanne, Switzerland.

© Copyright 2026 Poets & Quants. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Poets & Quants, please submit your request HERE.