Handicapping Your MBA OddsThe latest in our popular MBA handicapping series by: John A. Byrne on November 22, 2013 | 19 minute read November 22, 2013 Copy Link Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email Share on LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp Share on Reddit Ms. Global Ad Exec 700 GMAT 3.2 GPA “Low GPA for two reasons: I purposely sought out the most challenging courses, taught by the toughest professors (placing a higher value on quality of course than what my grade would be in it), and my GPA doesn’t include my year abroad plus a semester internship, accordingly a couple of “not-so-great” grades are weighted more heavily” Undergraduate degree in journalism with a concentration in Middle East studies from the Medill School at Northwestern Work experience includes five years at one of the world’s most famous global advertising agencies, with the past year as an expat in Asia managing the agency’s China and Asia Pacific business for one of P&G’s billion-dollar brands. Have been promoted four times in the past five years Extracurricular involvement as a volunteer and mentor for an Iraqi Refugee family (of 3 women) for four years, helping them set up a new life in the U.S; also vice president of my company’s first ever minority employee resource group, dedicated to increasing minority employee retention and cultivating a culturally diverse corporate environment Goal: To eventually become either a chief marketing officer or the head of global advertising agency. 27-year-old white female, first woman in my family to go to college Odds of Success: Harvard: 15% Stanford: 10% Wharton: 20% INSEAD: 40%+ Chicago: 20% Columbia: 30% Sandy’s Analysis: Lots to like and HBS and Stanford admit kids from Big Advertising firms. However, in your case, I think the combination of a super low GPA (despite your explanations), a marginal (for them) GMAT (700) and non-minority status will be hard to overcome. Ditto Wharton, although if they were going to make an exception to their “grades-and-GMAT” only policy for white people, it could be with you. The best way to offset those grades would be to develop an alternative transcript — that is pretty much the only explanation schools value. You should have taken calculus, stats, finance, etc. while in the U.S., especially if the Quant part of your 700 is low. I know it sounds like hellish advice given your many pluses–Asian gig in big Ad Agency, work with Iraqi family, first gen college, and helping URMs at your firm–but that is the way I see it. I don’t think this was ever going to be Stanford. WIth an alternative transcript and a good Quant GMAT score, you might have had a less than reach shot at HBS and Wharton. Booth and Columbia are not going to be walk-ins, either. Columbia has become stats oriented as well, although your focus on advertising and their location in NYC provides a natural synergy, and makes you pretty employable. That dynamic could make them blink at GPA. INSEAD should like this because they like Americans. You don’t seem a natural fit at Booth. Your natural sweet spot with this story and stats are U.S. schools ranked 10 and above: NYU, Duke, Darden, Anderson. Previous Page Continue ReadingPage 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 © Copyright 2026 Poets & Quants. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Poets & Quants, please submit your request HERE.