Chicago Booth | Mr. Corporate Development
GMAT 740, GPA 3.2
Tepper | Ms. Coding Tech Leader
GMAT 680, GPA 2.9
Stanford GSB | Mr. Impactful Consultant
GMAT 730, GPA 3.7
McCombs School of Business | Ms. Registered Nurse Entrepreneur
GMAT 630, GPA 3.59
Rice Jones | Mr. Simple Manufacturer
GRE 320, GPA 3.95
Kellogg | Mr. Hopeful Engineer
GMAT 720, GPA 7.95/10 (College follows relative grading; Avg. estimate around 7-7.3)
Wharton | Mr. Rates Trader
GMAT 750, GPA 7.6/10
Stanford GSB | Mr. Former SEC Athlete
GMAT 620, GPA 3.8
Tuck | Mr. Army To MBB
GMAT 740, GPA 2.97
Columbia | Mr. Forbes 30 Under 30
GMAT 730, GPA 3.4
Stanford GSB | Mr. MBB Advanced Analytics
GMAT 750, GPA 3.1
Chicago Booth | Mr. Banker To CPG Leader
GMAT 760, GPA 7.36/10
Ross | Mr. Leading-Edge Family Business
GMAT 740, GPA 2.89
Darden | Mr. Logistics Guy
GRE Not taken Yet, GPA 3.1
Chicago Booth | Mr. Desi Boy
GMAT 740, GPA 3.0
Kellogg | Mr. Stylist & Actor
GMAT 760 , GPA 9.5
Columbia | Mr. Ambitious Chemical Salesman
GMAT 720, GPA 3.3
Harvard | Mr. Irish Biotech Entrepreneur
GMAT 730, GPA 3.2
Stanford GSB | Mr. Cricketer Turned Engineer
GMAT 770, GPA 7.15/10
Wharton | Mr. Planes And Laws
GRE 328, GPA 3.8
McCombs School of Business | Mr. Refrad
GMAT 700, GPA 3.94
Harvard | Mr. Supply Chain Photographer
GMAT 700, GPA 3.3
Chicago Booth | Mr. Space Launch
GMAT 710, GPA 3.0
Kellogg | Ms. Product Strategist
GMAT 700, GPA 7.3/10
Columbia | Mr. MBB Consultant
GRE 339, GPA 8.28
Berkeley Haas | Mr. Avocado Farmer
GMAT 750, GPA 3.08
Georgetown McDonough | Mr. International Development Consultant
GMAT N/A, GPA 2.9

Middle Management Vanishing? Tuck Professor vs. Simon Dean

Dartmouth College Tuck School of Business professor Sydney Finkelstein

Dartmouth College Tuck School of Business professor Sydney Finkelstein

Much has been made of the vanishing American middle class, but there’s another disappearance underway that will have a profound effect on certain MBAs’ career opportunities, claims Dartmouth College Tuck School of Business professor Sydney Finkelstein. Last week, Finkelstein argued in an op-ed on the BBC international website that middle-management is on the way to near extinction.

“Technological advances have already taken their toll on lower-level jobs. Office software, including email, enables executive assistants to take on more work. ATMs replace tellers; Amazon eliminates store clerks; automated toll-free numbers have reduced the need for customer service reps. What do you think these changes have done to the people who supervised all these front-line workers? That’s right, there’s just not the same need for them.

“Human-resource managers, for instance, can’t keep up with the latest computer algorithms that do a better job identifying what job skills are needed for a particular position, and how to get talent, than they do. So companies begin to wonder: why do we need all of those HR managers? Bosses who used to make choices over the type of music we listen to, or TV shows we watch, can’t keep up with data-driven analyses from Apple, Netflix, and Amazon that can much more accurately assess what content we want,” writes Finkelstein, a Tuck management professor and faculty director of the Tuck Center for Leadership.

SOFTWARE SAYS: YOU’RE OUT OF A JOB

Indeed, technology’s effects on the overall U.S. jobs picture don’t appear to bode well for a lot of workers, including middle managers, whose numbers can be expected to shrink both because there will be fewer employees to manage, and because technological advances will cut the number of management tasks needing to be done by humans. The Associated Press, in an 2013 investigation, concluded that while rapidly evolving technology is replacing repetitive-task workers with software, “as software becomes even more sophisticated, victims are expected to include those who juggle tasks, such as supervisors and managers . . . technology is eliminating far more jobs than it is creating.”

Finkelstein goes on to point at the rise of entrepreneurship as another major factor driving middle management in the direction of oblivion. “Start-up cultures have had just as big an impact. Start-ups hate middle management!,” he writes in the BBC op-ed. “Within start-ups, there are people who generate business ideas, people who write code, and people who sell what comes together from those ideas and that code. None of these essential jobs in the start-up world is dependent on middle managers making sure people do what they’re supposed to do. Instead, start-ups embody the notion that you can do more with fewer, pushing each individual contributor to take on greater job responsibility.”

Lean startup guru Steve Blank sees middle management in the startup ecosystem evolving, rather than disappearing, with people in those positions handed increasing independence to accomplish the missions. “We’re going to give them a little more freedom, but also make them more responsive and agile. That’s a very different way to manage organizations, even for what I’ll call the pencil pushers,” Blank says. “I don’t think we’re going to replace middle management – I think we’re going to redefine their roles.”

INCREASING SPAN OF CONTROL SHOWS FEWER MANAGERS NEEDED, PROF SAYS

Finkelstein tells Poets&Quants that his basis for asserting that middle-management jobs are going away is mostly anecdotal, and in fact he admits his BBC piece was meant to provoke. But he says research into span of control – the number of people a manager manages – supports his contention. While managers in years past supervised an average of about six people, now, thanks to such advances as email, remote work, and collaborative software, they’re managing about 15, Finkelstein says. “You need way fewer middle managers,” he says. “It’s not that middle management is going to disappear, but the number of middle managers absolutely is going down.”

Naturally, major changes in management structures would profoundly affect graduates of management programs, such as MBAs. But Finkelstein asserts that the effects will depend on the school. “The MBA degree is not a one-size-fits-all around the country, around the world. There are really different levels and different gradations,” Finkelstein says. “If you’re in an MBA program that’s really focused on preparing people for middle-management jobs, you’re going to be in trouble.”

Page 1 of 4