Stanford GSB | Ms. S & H
GMAT 750, GPA 3.47
Columbia | Ms. Cybersecurity
GRE 322, GPA 3.7
Kellogg | Mr. Multinational Strategy
GRE 305, GPA 3.80
Kellogg | Mr. Defense Contractor
GMAT 730, GPA 3.2
Duke Fuqua | Mr. O&G Geoscientist
GRE 327, GPA 2.9
Kenan-Flagler | Ms. Big Pharma
GRE 318, GPA 3.3
Chicago Booth | Mr. US Army Veteran
GMAT 710, GPA 3.7
GMAT 770, GPA 3.7
Duke Fuqua | Mr. 911 System
GMAT 690, GPA 3.02
Duke Fuqua | Mr. Agribusiness
GRE 308, GPA 3.04
Stanford GSB | Mr. 750
GMAT 750, GPA 3.43
Duke Fuqua | Mr. Tech Evangelist
GMAT 690, GPA 3.2
NYU Stern | Mr. Bioinformatics
GMAT 710, GPA 3.7
Harvard | Mr. Investment Banker
GMAT 750, GPA 4.0
MIT Sloan | Mr. International Impact
GRE 326, GPA 3.5
Harvard | Mr. Bangladeshi Analyst
GMAT 690, GPA 3.31
INSEAD | Mr. Indian In Cambodia
GMAT 730, GPA 3.33
Stanford GSB | Mr. Techie Teacher
GMAT 760, GPA 3.80
McCombs School of Business | Mr. Consulting Analyst
GMAT 700, GPA 7.7/10
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Emporio Armani
GMAT 780, GPA 3.03
Yale | Mr. Fencer
GMAT 740, GPA 3.48
Chicago Booth | Mr. Inclusive Consultant
GMAT 650, GPA 6.7
London Business School | Mr. Green Energy
GMAT 710, GPA 3.1
Kellogg | Mr. Engineer Volunteer
GMAT 710, GPA 3.8
Berkeley Haas | Ms. Midwest Startup
GRE 328, GPA 3.51
Wharton | Mr. Data Scientist
GMAT 740, GPA 7.76/10
Wharton | Mr. Global Perspective
GMAT 750, GPA 3.6

How Wharton Fought Its Way To The Top Of U.S. News’ MBA Ranking

Wharton has tied Harvard Business School for first place in the 2017 U.S. News’ MBA Ranking

It’s no secret that the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School has been slipping in MBA rankings in recent years, often falling behind the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. In Poets&Quants’ ranking of the best full-time MBA programs, Booth has bested Wharton in six of the seven P&Q lists since 2010.

For years, regardless of rankings, the conventional wisdom has been that Harvard, Stanford and Wharton are at the top of the world’s business school elite. Increasingly, however, that convention has been questioned given a long string of Booth victories over Wharton. Last year, for the first time ever, Booth topped Wharton in the U.S. News’ ranking.

Asked about the slippage by Wharton students at a town hall in October, Dean Geoffrey Garrett suggested that the school’s lagging financial support of students was a key factor in the school’s ranking decline. “Correlation is not causation, but it is true that HBS and GSB spend considerable more money at the MBA level than we do and we suspect that’s true for Chicago Booth as well,” he conceded. “We should just try to do the best job we can and it’ll work out in the rankings. I think it’s much harder to game at the top.”


Wharton Dean Geoffrey Garrett gets his first No. 1 ranking in U.S. News

Since that on-campus town hall, however, the school’s most famous alum has won election as President of the U.S. and now Wharton has moved into a first place tie with Harvard Business School in the 2017 U.S. News’ MBA ranking. It is only the second time in 28 years that Wharton has captured the top prize in what is arguably the most-watched business school ranking of all (see The Big Surprises In U.S. News’ 2017 MBA Ranking).

Wharton fought its way to the top, from fourth place last year, with improved pay and employment numbers. Average salary and bonus at Wharton topped all schools at $155,058, a healthy 5.7% rise. The percentage of employed students at graduation also beat HBS, Stanford and Booth at 85.8%, up from 80.8% a year earlier. The percentage of students with jobs three months after commencement also crushed its peers at 95.5%, up from 93.5%. These three metrics alone account for 35% of U.S. News’ ranking, with 21% for employment and roughly 14% for pay. Along with GMAT and GPA scores, these stats have the most impact on year-over-year changes in the ranking.

But there’s a potentially troubling issue with the quality of those stats. Unlike Harvard, Stanford and Booth, whose results are based on a 100% to 99% report rate from graduates, the Wharton numbers reflect a much smaller sample size of 92%. A record 65 MBAs out of a graduating class of 850 students failed to report on their career outcomes to Wharton last year. As a percentage of the students actually seeking employment—639—some 10.2% didn’t bother to fill out and return Wharton’s survey.


It’s generally assumed that graduates who fail to complete a school’s career surveys are among the least satisifed with their MBA experience. They are more likely to be unemployed and more likely to have accepted a job that pays less than expected. So lower response rates can lead to artificially inflated pay and employment stats. What’s more, a large non-report allowances creates a perverse ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ incentive for schools to ignore students still looking for jobs.

It creates the temptation for a career management office to be more aggressive in getting the report from a satisfied graduate who landed a high-paying job over a disaffected student who may be either unemployed or under-employed. That’s why high response rates on these surveys lead to more credible and authoritative results. Low reporting rates can lead to artifically high salary and bonus and employment rates—and it’s hardly a signal of high student confidence in the quality of career services.

The Financial Times, which tracks response rates in its review of school data, shows that among its ranked U.S. MBA programs at least 44 schools, including Temple University’s Fox School of Business in Wharton’s hometown of Philadelphia, boast 100% response rates. Another 16 schools have response rates of 99% or 98%. Harvard, Kellogg, Tuck, U.C. Berkeley, UVA Darden hit 100% last year. Stanford, Chicago Booth, MIT Sloan, Duke Fuqua, Yale SOM reported response rates of 99%.

About The Author

John A. Byrne is the founder and editor-in-chief of C-Change Media, publishers of Poets&Quants and four other higher education websites. He has authored or co-authored more than ten books, including two New York Times bestsellers. John is the former executive editor of Businessweek, editor-in-chief of Businessweek. com, editor-in-chief of Fast Company, and the creator of the first regularly published rankings of business schools. As the co-founder of CentreCourt MBA Festivals, he hopes to meet you at the next MBA event in-person or online.