Wharton | Mr. Indian VC
GRE 333, GPA 3.61
MIT Sloan | Mr. Tech Enthusiast
GRE 325, GPA 6.61/10
Stanford GSB | Mr. Low GPA To Stanford
GMAT 770, GPA 2.7
Harvard | Mr. Midwest Dreamer
GMAT 760, GPA 3.3
Kellogg | Mr. Young PM
GMAT 710, GPA 9.64/10
Foster School of Business | Ms. Diamond Dealer
GRE 308, GPA Merit
NYU Stern | Mr. Low Undergraduate GPA
GMAT 720 (Expected), GPA 2.49
Stanford GSB | Ms. Try Something New
GMAT 740, GPA 3.86
Darden | Mr. Military Missile Defense
GRE 317, GPA 3.26
Wharton | Mr. Army Bahasa
GRE 312, GPA 3.57
Harvard | Mr. Consulting To Public Service
GMAT 750, GPA 3.7
Wharton | Mr. Strategy To Real Estate
GMAT 750, GPA 3.9
Stanford GSB | Ms. Standard Consultant
GMAT 750, GPA 3.46
Harvard | Mr. 1st Gen Brazilian LGBT
GMAT 720, GPA 3.2
Berkeley Haas | Mr. Hanging By A Thread
GMAT 710, GPA 3.8
NYU Stern | Mr. Customer Success
GMAT 710, GPA 3.3
Harvard | Mr. Industrial Goods To MBB
GMAT 650, GPA 3.35
Stanford GSB | Mr. Family Biz From Chile
GMAT 710, GPA 5.5/7.0 (Ranked 6 out of 181 of class)
Tuck | Mr. Military Communications Officer
GRE 320, GPA 3.45
Harvard | Dr. Harvard Biotech
GRE 322, GPA 4.0
Harvard | Ms. Global Connector
GMAT 750, GPA 3.8
London Business School | Ms. Tech Researcher
GRE 331, GPA 3.17
Kellogg | Mr. Nigerian Engineer
GRE 310, GPA 3.5/5.0
Harvard | Ms. Indian Business Analyst
GMAT 740, GPA 3.5
UCLA Anderson | Mr. National Table Tennis
GMAT 720, GPA 4
INSEAD | Mr. Petroleum Engineer
GMAT 690, GPA 3.46
Georgetown McDonough | Mr. Aspiring Consultant
GMAT 690, GPA 3.68

An Interview with Wharton’s Admissions Gatekeeper

Is every application read? Or if one comes in with a GMAT that is less than 600, is it immediately thrown away?

We read every single file. We don’t have cutoffs. Every file gets its due. It gets looked at and evaluated no matter what. If you look at our GMAT range on the website, you’ll see that there are people who have GMATs in the 500s. There is something pretty spectacular and special about those folks. If you stop reading because something seems it might not line up, you could miss a real gem.

Do you have a weighting system that gives a certain percentage of clout to a GMAT score, a GPA, the essays, recommendations, etc.?

No. If only it were so formulaic we would all sleep a lot more and vacation a lot more. It is a very holistic process. We ask for a lot of information on an applicant’s background and history, academics, professional experiences, and career trajectory. We ask for recommendations. We want to know how they spend their time outside of work. We ask about all those different pieces because it is an incredibly holistic process for us. We are trying to understand applicants on paper and then in the interview. There isn’t a weighting structure or a formula we use to get to the answer. It’s all incredibly important.

And if the first reader doesn’t think the applicant is Wharton material does it end there or go onto a second review?

Everything gets more than one read. We want multiple perspectives. That’s the value of having the committee. Every application will get read a minimum of two times.

And the second read is my an admissions officer as well?

That’s right. And I see everything before a decision is made and there may be more. So admittedly, often times there is discussion and dialogue around files because it is personal and we feel strongly about candidates and we want to advocate for them.

Well, then, do you have a scoring system?

We have evaluative comments on the different aspects of a candidate’s application. There is certainly a calibration scale we use. But again it’s not formulaic. We don’t plug it all into an equation for an answer.

When is there discussion around an application?

The debate and the dialogue happen throughout the process. There are some candidates that we all align around and there are some that we don’t. It’s very much an ongoing process.

After you interview someone and fthe eedback report comes back, what happens then?

It goes through additional admission officers. Every file will get touched by virtually everyone in the office. The goal is to get multiple perspectives.

And you really see every application, even the rejects?

It’s personal. I care. It’s my brand as well. You just want to make sure you give everyone a fair look so you don’t miss anything.

What’s the standard drill for notifying applicants about the decision?

We do our best to get to people as quickly as we can. Our goal is to get to them by phone or even email if we can. Our students help as well. If they’re accepted, we want to give that personal welcome.

Is there anything you don’t like about the process?

I wish applicants really believed how personal it is for us. It’s never easy when one receives bad news, but I truly hope they understand how much we really value the time and energy they put into it.

So why doesn’t Wharton offer feedback to applicants who get turned down?

When I first started we actually did. But the demand for feedback far outweighs the supply that we can provide. We could probably spend all day, every day, for a year giving feedback. That was a concern. Quite frankly, having done them, you would ask a candidate, “Well, what do you think?” And there is nothing that I ever said that they didn’t say themselves. So we all know when you walk away from something and reflect on it. Inherently, you know.

Now be honest. Is this really a hard job?

It is a tremendous honor and privilege. I feel incredibly lucky to do this. Wharton is a school I care deeply about. It has transformed my life not once, but twice and maybe even a third time now that I am working here. I’ve worked a lot of hard jobs. I’ve put in a lot of hours in the jobs I’ve done. But I must be honest. This has been the most rewarding and fulfilling of all of them. That’s why I do it.

About The Author

John A. Byrne is the founder and editor-in-chief of C-Change Media, publishers of Poets&Quants and four other higher education websites. He has authored or co-authored more than ten books, including two New York Times bestsellers. John is the former executive editor of Businessweek, editor-in-chief of Businessweek. com, editor-in-chief of Fast Company, and the creator of the first regularly published rankings of business schools. As the co-founder of CentreCourt MBA Festivals, he hopes to meet you at the next MBA event in-person or online.