What An Average GMAT Will Get You

In the fictional town of Lake Wobegone, the creation of National Public Radio personality Garrison Keillor, all the children are “above-average” because no one can ever admit to being merely average.

In the real world, especially the harshly real and competitive world of getting into a top business school, average doesn’t get you very far. The average score of the Graduate Admission Management Test (GMAT) is about 540 on a scale of 200 to 800.

If you hit that 540 average, you’re not exactly Harvard Business School material. Last year’s entering class at Harvard had a mean GMAT score of 724, which put the typical HBS first year in the 95th percentile of test takers. At 728, Stanford’s average score was even higher. At 722, Yale’s School of Management wasn’t far behind. (See the “Super GMAT Schools” where average scores are in the 85th percentile or above).

Indeed, the average GMAT score for Poets&Quants’ top ten U.S. business schools is a remarkably high 716. And there are now 13 U.S. schools where the average GMAT score is above 700. Of course, the very definition of average means that there are many who score below that number and many who score above it.

Even so, what does an average score get you on the GMAT exam?

If you’re merely average–as so many of us are–it most likely means you can forget about going to even a ranked business school. By and large, the MBA programs that accept average scores are off the beaten path. Only one of the 35 schools on our “average” list–Howard University in Washington, D.C.–makes our top 100 list of the best U.S. schools. Some of these schools even lack official accreditation. As for elite corporate recruiters? You won’t find McKinsey & Co. Goldman Sachs, Google or Apple interviewing MBA grads at any of these schools.

On the other hand, you also won’t have much trouble getting in. Most of the schools decline to report the percentage of applicants they accept, probably because it’s so high it could be somewhat embarrassing. Of the schools on our list who do report this number, it’s worth noting that Union Graduate College in Schenectady, N.Y., accepts 96.6% of its applicants. The lowest acceptance rate? Howard University’s 38.7%.

So what kind of school can you get into if you have merely an average GMAT score? We found 35 MBA programs in the U.S. for the average person. The list below was compiled by taking the average score–540–and then searching for business schools that were no more than 10 points higher or 10 points lower than 540. Of course, your GMAT score is only one of many variables used by admission committees to accept or reject applicants. But it is, by far, the single most important factor at most business schools which is why the test–whether the GMAT or the GRE–cause applicants so much worry.

There are, by the way, five schools whose latest entering class hit the average score exactly on its head: the Jack Welch College of Business at Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, Ct., and the B-schools at the University of Toledo, the University of Tampa, the University of Hartford, and Clarion University in Pennsylvania.


SchoolAverage GMAT Average GPA Applicants Accepted
Western Kentucky (Ford) Bowling Green, KY550NANA
California State University Chico, CA5503.11NA
California State University Long Beach, CA5503.15NA
Morgan State University (Graves) Baltimore, MD5503.60NA
Quinnipiac University Hamden, CT5593.32NA
University of South Florida St. Petersburg, FL5503.40NA
University of West Florida Pensacola, FL5453.42NA
Union Graduate College Schenectady, NY5453.3096.6%
Salisbury University (Perdue) Salisbury, MD5453.50NA
St. John’s University (Tobin) Queens, NY5443.2069.1%
Penn State University (Black) Erie, PA5443.31NA
Canisius College (Wehle) Buffalo, NY5443.22NA
Southern Utah University Cedar City, UT5433.50NA
Clarkson University Potsdam, NY5433.3187.1%
California State University San Bernardino, CA5423.43NA
Arkansas State University State University, AR5413.14NA
University of Toledo Toledo, OH5403.30NA
University of Tampa (Sykes) Tampa, FL5403.4043.7%
University of Hartford (Barney) West Hartford, CT5403.33NA
Sacred Heart University (Welch) Fairfield, CT5403.46NA
Clarion University Clarion, PA5403.47NA
University of Memphis (Fogelman) Memphis, TN5393.20NA
Pace University (Lubin) New York, NY5393.3362.1%
UNC-Wilmington (Cameron) Wilmington, NC5383.30NA
New Jersey Institute of Tech Newark, NJ538NANA
Howard University Washington, DC5373.1038.7%
West Virginia University Morgantown, WV5363.4347.1%
University of Texas–Permian Basin Odessa, TX5353.03NA
University of Kansas Lawrence, KS5353.2981.9%
East Tennessee State Johnson City, TN5353.10NA
Boise State University Boise, ID5343.16NA
Washington State University Pullman, WA5323.44NA
Georgia Southern University Statesboro, GA5313.24NA
Widener University Chester, PA530NANA
Minnesota State University Mankato, MN5303.20NA

Source: School reports



  • Pasqualina Lattanzio

    I will like to ask this question before i go straight to my public announcement out here. If getting a legit loan online was so easy as stated in all this fabricated / duplicated loan testimonies that i have been reading through online, then why was i and my lovely husband turned down for a loan online five times after been scammed of about $42000 Australian Dollars? We the loan seekers are the common regular victims of this fake loan stories simply because we are in dire needs we believe in their stories out of desperation and sometimes frustrations to get a loan, but at the end of it all we find out that we have gained nothing but rather loosed the little we have into the hands of this online scammers who claim to be real and reliable loan lenders. The last loan lenders that ripped us off our hard earned money asked us to pay some few amount worth $800 dollars for insurance because they said that we were on high risk. How is that? I still don’t understand. how can a lender be requesting several fees from a borrower? if that borrower was having money would he or she have come along to ask for a loan? those lenders deceived my husband and i of getting a loan and we thought it was all real because we never believed that there was anything as an online loan scam and they had us pay all we had to them and due to the way things were moving we had to close out our business over here in Australia as we could not meet up with the customers needs any longer because we sold all most every single thing we had and we could not replace them as we thought that we could do so if we get our requested loan amount. In a lay man language, YES !! we were scammed by almost six different lenders online, Before a customer who was a closed friend to my family saw the way things were so bad for us and decided to introduce us to a private loan company that was registered and accredited by the government.But frankly speak-en, we refused any further loan offer because we had concluded that all of them were scams and the same but he insisted as he opened up to me and my husband how he got a loan from the loan firm he narrated to us that he has so much and high integrity in granting loans to the world. He also told us that this loan firm called Derek Barlow Loan company is a reliable and a reputable loan firm know in the world for reliable work. After this our family friend called Marin Carl has told us so much about this loan firm, I and my lovely husband had no other option than to believe him, because we knew him from the onset to be a man of unquestionable characters who was always known for his words and we applied with this company that he called Derek Barlow Loan Firm but prior to our application with this email address: derekbarlowloans@yahoo.com , that he provided to us to contact the reliable loan firm, Without fear that we are applying for a loan from a firm that will not scam us out of our hard earned money like others. It was to my own satisfaction and i applied but God was so kind that he lead us through and we got our loan after meeting with the terms and conditions this loan firm and we follow up with the non-collateral loan process and meet up with the requirement in getting our loan. Am by name Lattenzio Pasqualina and you can send me an email on the following email address: which is my private email address if you need more clarification. Because i am ready to do all that is within my reach to let the whole world know that Derek Barlow Loans is the only real and existing loan firm online that can grant you loan without any form of scam activities. You will also find my identity card on some of my post to let everyone that need loan know that Derek Barlow Loan is the only real and reliable loan firm online in the world that could grant us our dream loan amount of $456000 Australian Dollars.

  • Michele D Waters Hooks

    Hello Everybody am so happy giving out my great testimony on how i got my desire loan amount from Loan Sharking Investment , I want to quickly use this opportunity to let the whole world know of this, Am Mrs Michele D Waters Hooks from Sheffield, Alabama USA, I was in search of a loan to start up my own business in support of my husband regarding the kids expenses so i went online searching for loan when i came across some lenders that cheat and scammed away my little money at that process of time i got confused i don’t even know what to do anymore because the little money i was having with me was taken away by those fraudulent bastards that call themselves real loan lenders, So on one faithful day as i was browsing through the internet searching for job i came across some testimonies commented on the forum by one Mr Charlie Gilberto, and Mrs Monica Luis on how they receive their loan from Loan Sharking Investment Email: loansharkinginvestment@gmail.com So i said to myself that i must give this a trial because i was so scared regarding what the others lenders did to me, so i went ahead took his personal E-mail address that was in those comments on the forum so i contacted him informing him that i was refereed to him by some customers that received their loan from his company, Mr Charlie Gilberto, and Mrs Monica Luis, So when he heard that he was very happy about that, So he assured me that am in the right company where i can receive my desire loan amount, They gave me the borrower loan application form to fill and return,I did all that, given them all my necessary information’s about me,So i was given the terms and condition of their company everything went smoothly without any delay, in not less than 48hours i was informed that my loan valid sum of $63,000 USD has been registered and approved by their lending board of trustee, So at that process of time i was so happy when they told me i should send them my banking details, But i was little skeptical of doing that so i said i have trust and believe for this lender call Mr Hubert Pawel, i gave them by bank account so surprisingly i received an alert from my bank that my account has been credited with the sum of $63,000 USD by Mr Hubert Pawel, wow..i almost fainted, So i urgently email him that i have receive my loan successfully, So my dear brothers and sisters out there still looking for genuine loan company i will advice you to kindly contact Mr Hubert Pawel with this same E-mail: loansharkinginvestment@gmail.com and i know he will also help you with your desire loan amount okay, Email them today and you will be glad just as i’m happy today.

  • joe

    kudos on your GMAT score. but you should think that MBA tuitions are typically 50k a year. Less the fortunate full-rides, the students must show financial guarantee before matriculation. It could be right that GMAT scores are high for some Asian region people, but it is also true that they are more likely to have a pretty good background to start their education with.

    Btw too many 730 scorers are taking Top 15….they may not be bad choices, but some of them might not fit you

  • sudhir

    I have scored 720 in GMAT, can i get stanford business school for MBA or is there any chance of getting top university with full scholarship? if anyone has any details please send details to me at : sudhir.k1990@outlook.com

  • Kenneth Chen

    There’s so much bullshit tossed around on this forum that its amazing.

    GMAT – GMAT is a data point. There are so many variable factors that GMAT is a test that standardizes a data point. How good are you at taking a test that everyone else is taking.

    Yes people with 520 can get into Harvard, but that person with the 520 also probably was the creator of a multi-million start up or has a recommendation from President Obama.

    If your GMAT is weak, then probability says you won’t get into a top MBA school. That’s all it means. Can you get into Harvard with a 520. YES. Will you likely get in with a 520 NO. So my question is why do you want to have a 1/10000 shot, as opposed to a 1/10 shot. That’s really what it comes down to. If you have a low GMAT, then EVERYTHING else on your application has to be dazzling, which is really really hard. Because if you got a job, how do you really stand out not just at your own job, but amongst other people that think they’re really great too. It’s really hard to measure. So GMAT is one way to measure. Salary is another way to measure. A company that regularly sends people to the school is another. Think of Admissions like the creation of a safety net. When you get into a school, you are part of a safety net in terms of salary and in terms of likelihood to fall through. Top MBAs have safety nets with higher salaries and fewer holes. Lower MBAs have lower safety nets with lower salaries and more people falling through the holes.

    Why some Bschools are better than others: RECRUITING. ALUMNI NETWORK. PEERS

    These are the three things however What you learn is similar; how you learn is different.

    At HBS or Stanford or even Booth or Insead, they all teach by Case methods. That means, you’re given a case study, and you have your set of tools that you have learned and how you would approach it. This is why consulting firms really like top MBA students – because consulting projects are very similar to case studies. So if you have a Private Equity Guy from KKR, with a BCG Consultant, with a Googler, with a military captain all on the same team – you get some pretty awesome approaches.

    At a lesser MBA, people come from less impressive backgrounds. It’s not to say they aren’t as smart. Not at all. Their backgrounds just offer less in terms of class participation.

    This is not to say Howard or whatever school isn’t great, its just the types of skills and types of background won’t be as impressive.

    Next is recruiting. Top MBA recruiters pay more. They want top talent and they want top talent young. They are willing to pay for it. So if you’re a Kellogg or a Wharton, people willing to pay your grads 130k + is very common and if you’re in Private Equity, maybe even as high as 400k.

    This is not to say the lower MBAs don’t get some high paying recruiters, they just don’t get as many so on average, probability says if you go to a lower ranked MBA, you will come out of it making less than (and most instances significantly less than) a top MBA. That’s all it means.

    The Number One guy at Howard probably can bat with the average guy at Harvard, but can the number 50 guy at Howard do so? Probability says no and statistically the answer is no too.

    Finally Alumni Network. Alumni Networks are there for life. The Two Best networks in my opinion are Harvard and McKinsey. Harvard Academically and McKinsey professionally. I think people from Harvard will hire Harvard and people from McKinsey want to hire McKinsey.

    This is not to say Harvard and McKinsey are the only networks that breed success, rather that Harvard and McKinsey have the highest quantity of people that are alive that are in positions of power or potential positions of power to help hire people.

    Are there also alum at lower MBAs. Of course. There are just fewer of them. If you look at any fortune 500 company leadership, most of the leadership is some combination of top MBA or consulting firm or both.

    So once again, please don’t take admissions personally. If you got a 520 GMAT and attend a lesser named MBA, it doesn’t mean you’re any less smarter, it just means you have a lower probability on average of landing a higher paying job.

  • nayar

    Each one has a different story… Its business for you & MBA for another …. success anyway !!
    so don’t discriminate

  • Julia Smith

    that is a great work

    Skills for GMAT

  • Keep in mind they aren’t talking about undergrad schools, but graduate schools. Often, schools that are very good schools for undergrads are not so great graduate schools.

  • Factchecker from Howard

    This article is incorrect in terms of recruitments. It explicitly states that you wont find any elite corporate sponsor at any of the schools on your list, including Howard University. I went to Howard University Undergrad and Goldman Sachs was my business teams corporate sponsor. We visited Goldman and did case studies there. Freshman year, one student from my team (AS A FRESHMAN) got to intern at Goldman. And by the time graduation (from undergrad) came along, the entire business class as well as engineering students had the opportunity to interview for Google, Apple, Goldman Sachs–matter of fact all the wall street firms, Intel, etc. I preferred to work in development so I didn’t attend any of these interview sessions, BUT I have friends who only have their under graduate degree and went straight to Goldman Sachs and other wall street firms, and Google, Apple, etc. They also recruit for MBA students. I’m very disappointed by this article. I visit this site often and expect that you all know what you are talking about. Do some research before you say things about universities. Seeing this makes me rethink the validity of the other information that has been published on this blog.

  • Rob

    I read an interesting profile of Mickey Drexler (CEO of J Crew) in which he expressed an earnest preference for hiring a waiter with 10 years experience over an academic MBA grad with little real-world experience for a management position. Just goes to show the relative value of things. Real-world is nearly always better than classroom. Just ask the admissions people for any MBA program; students with real world experience benefit more from an MBA degree than those who don’t have that experience.

  • Yirmin

    The schools are not really any better than a large public university program… what makes them different is the selectivity of the students they accept. A recruiter knows that he could find a good candidate in most any large university, but he knows that in some where they accept everyone and his dog that he would have to sit through countless interviews before he found that one stand out… on the other hand if the recruiter goes to a place like Harvard he knows that every student there was already pre-screened by the university and even the weakest candidate he has in any given group of interviews will be stronger than the ones he would find at the large public university.

    This then becomes a chicken and egg kind of thing… students that are strong will know that they can only get the interview for the best jobs by going to the best school… The down side is that when a school declines as Harvard has their is a very slow process of recruiters deciding to cross it off the list and for students to realize that and stop applying. If you look at the rigor of the program today compared to how it was in the 1970’s it is frightening. The work load has been reduced significantly, students that are currently admitted could not really have had a chance of being accepted a few decades ago when they were much more selective. In large part because the size of the class has grown.

  • Sopbiz99

    I have more of a question than a comment.  What is it that makes the top business schools better than others?  Thinking purely from a probability perspective with an athletic metaphor, it would seem likely more of an ebb and flow would take place.  Much like the Detroit Lion’s almost winless season, while they remained in the NFL, they literally sucked in terms of outcome.  Are these schools more of an executive training camp or is the education simply that much better?  Statistically, how could the latter be with so many colleges offering exposure to quality curriculums and access to technology? 

  • Londonbanker

    1) Nice try. But this is patently false. If economic status was a filter, then kids from China/India would be behind the U.S. in terms of GMAT scores. But in reality, the GMAT scores of kids from these countries is much much better than the U.S. (based on average scores). The economic status of of Chinese/Indian families is much worse than the vast majority of U.S. families. You might want to consider bringing race into this 

    2) you make a valid point, but again this is a phenomenon for non-ranked program only. For any program in top 20, the graduation % would be 100% or something very close. 

    3) I find GPA and GMAT figures semi-interesting, but what would be a much better predictor would be % of class that found jobs after 3 months and average/median salary post MBA

    (My GMAT score 730 and I sure as hell won’t be attending an MBA lower than Top 5 in the U.S.)

  • Joeblank

    You are all missing the point. Mr. Byrne is not talking about absolutes. He is not talking about black and white. He is talking about generalities. 

    Talking about this in a more juvenile manner…there are many stories of successful individuals who did not attend college, or even graduate from high school. However, there are many more stories of successful individuals who graduated from high school and attended college.

  • Courtney,

    Thanks for weighing in with some very helpful comment. I think Howard gets such A-plus recruiters partly because it’s a great school to recruit highly talented African-Americans from. That puts Howard in a different category than many other business schools.

  • Courtney Stokes

    Hey Mr.Byrne,
    I just wanted to add a little bit of personal experience to a comment some above me already mentioned. I think you are underestimating the value of “average” schools. Howard University is listed as an average school and one of the top 100 in the country. You also stated that you would not be recruited by big corporate recruiters like GS, Bain, Apple, Google, etc. I would like to let you know that all of those corporations, as well as numerous others from wall street/around the country all recruit HEAVILY at Howard University for UNDERGRADS. I have a number of classmates who just graduated in May, like myself, who now work at Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman, Barclay’s, Google, Apple, Bain, Intel, Exxon, HBS, Carlyle Group, etc, and they are 22. I myself, at 23, am an associate manager at a Fortune 500 company. We were all heavily recruited after undergrad on campus, and all of the firms you mentioned were heavily visible the entire 4 years of my undergraduate career. They also recruit at the graduate level. I think you may have underestimated the value that corporations may find in “average” schools. I don’t think you did that on purpose, but it’s easy to overlook other great places when they are in the shadow of Harvard and Yale. I’m also not sure where you got the information that those companies don’t recruit at the schools on the average list. Maybe some other universities you previously thought didn’t have many “big name” recruits actually do. Just wanted to give you some insight! Thanks.

  • Abdullah,

    Thanks for sharing your story. Sounds like you’re getting an MBA by working in your own business. For many people that can be a far more valuable experience. Congrats.

  • Abdullah

    well, take it or leave it..I am from UAE..I was thinking that the only way to be a successful is by doing MBA at Harvard..I spent my childhood working with my father in our family business..I was doing great with him..I graduated from local Uni with avg grade..thinking about MBA was taking from my time and hence losing money!!! and some of my clients hired managers whom worked with Bain & Co as consultant and did their MBAs at top Schools..the reality which I was unable to see is that those consultants were doing MBAs to reach what I already had !!! what I eventually did is forget the GMAT and the MBA and focus on my business..and thank god..I am now generating seven digits USD profit and still under 35..

  • LondonCalling

    Interesting piece. Of course, some people who sit for the GMAT earn scores lower than they’d hoped and elect to not attend business school at all (and, hence, these people are part of the GMAT curve, but “disappear” from the admit statistics). Further, there are GMAT scores that respresent subsequent (or previous) tests taken by people who later/earlier earned better scores. Overall, the data here is not all that interesting, but the politics around which schools are accepting students with ordinary scores (and which will not publish their admissions rates) is somewhat interesting — more interesting would be what factors these schools are using to distinguish between many applicants with similar, unremarkable test scores.

  • saurabh gaur

    Need some serious advise on the MBA Programs in US. Please help.
    GMAT 730 and AWA 6.
    Whats the prospects for an MBA from a top US school? Plus how much of a factor is for an MBA grad to land a job in US if he or she does not have work rights? Thanks a lot.

  • Interesting article, and I like that there is some coverage for good schools that fall outside that top 20-25 that tend to get all the hype online these days. But since it’s a GMAT-focused article and the GMAT does test statistics and the use of statistics to draw conclusions I figured I should draw a little attention to this. Saying that these schools whose average GMAT scores are equal to the overall GMAT average of 540 means that they’re schools that accept average students is a little tricky – that logic is taking the average of an average, which tends to cause trouble on GMAT problems. While the average score at one of these schools may be 540, the range is likely quite a bit wider, and the mean may not equal the median or mode. So on a statistical GMAT basis, it’s tricky logic and something that students should approach with caution. Similarly, the title of the table is a little misleading in a GMAT critical reasoning sense. That the average scores at these schools are within 10 points of 540 doesn’t draw the implied conclusion that these are “the schools you can get into with a 540”. Plenty of schools with averages in the upper 500s and low 600s will take quite a few students with 540-range scores.

    So for anyone reading this article and still considering a GMAT retake, keep in mind that part of your goal to score higher on the exam will require you to understand statistics and the conclusions drawn from them. For getting an idea of some of the more-unheralded MBA programs that are available in your region, this article does a great job; as a method of studying for GMAT quant and critical reasoning, it may lead you a little bit astray.

  • I had a couple of thoughts while reading this article…

    1) How many of the high GMAT scorers have taken the GMAT multiple times? When I took the GMAT in 2009, the fee for the test was $250. Even with one re-take, you are spending a lot of money on an admissions test. It’s not so hard to rival what you would spend on CPA exams simply on taking the GMAT multiple times! Plus it is a 4 hour test. I agree with Mike in that many people cannot invest so much into an admissions test. With that being said, the GMAT probably does more weeding out than we think not only in regard to academic ability…but also social and economic status.

    2) Admissions rates are sort of interesting…but graduation rates would be golden! Of course I realize that I may be the only person worried about this metric. However my MBA program just recently LOWERED the required GMAT score for admission. However, looking at my cohort, I see quite a few people not finishing the program. My non-ranked MBA program is no walk in the park; especially in the quantitative subjects (my Business school also houses the computer science/engineering school so a few of my professors are engineers by training). Cash-strapped public universities are very hungry for tuition dollars right now. So admissions numbers don’t impress me as much as the graduation/completion rate.

    Nice article though; but a bit disappointed with the condescending tone.

    (my GMAT score = 560 btw)

  • ben

    I think it is incorrect to assume that a poor GMAT means attending an average MBA program. I never had a 650+ on my GMAT, but I had superb transcripts, solid work experience and glowing referrals – and I got into a top 15 MBA program.

    Even Sandy Kreisberg, the HBS guru, stated in a 2010 Fortune article that someone with a 520 GMAT score (below the average of 540) got admitted in the 2012 class.

    I still say apply to a good school and take a chance, you never know which parts of your resume appeal to the admissions committee and you still might stand a chance.

  • Rory Barratt


    Good article.

    Everywhere you look on the internet you see people talking about their 760 GMAT score and how the top schools regularly decline the applications of people with great scores. It’s good to see a little perspective, I think that many schools who are not listed in the top 100 have great programs and are great value for money, people shouldn’t be put off an MBA if they have only achieved an average GMAT.

    I have a 710 (he adds quickly). 🙂

  • Mike Johns

    John, I think that people (including yourself) are getting carried away with the characterization of these schools and the people that attend them. I think that anyone who committs themself to earning a graduate degree is to be applauded. People come from so many different backgrounds and can’t focus soley on getting a 700 GMAT score when everyday life stuff is happening. I think that HBS is a wonderful school but I think that schools like Howard have a great value proposition as well. Also, I know people from above average schools that can’t find an average job. Yikes!!!! Guess they thought that GMAT score would work miracles during the interview. It’s up to the individual applicant to find the right fit and go for it. You must be running out of topic b/c these things are getting boring/redundant.