Tuck | Mr. Invest In Change
GMAT 710, GPA 3.1
Tuck | Mr. Chemical Engineer
GRE 326, GPA 3
INSEAD | Mr. Future AI Product Manager
GMAT 715, GPA 3.7
NYU Stern | Mr. Operations Strategy & Youth Leadership
GMAT 770, GPA 4
IE Business School | Mr. JD Garay
GRE GPA: 3.9, GPA 3.0
Kellogg SOM | Mr. Military To Entrepreneur
GMAT 745, GPA 2.38
London Business School | Mr. Decarbonisation
GMAT 695, GPA 3.5
Kellogg SOM | Mr. MENA Growth Equity
GMAT 730, GPA 3.4
Kellogg SOM | Mr. West Point Logistics
GRE 327, GPA 2.76
Harvard | Mr. Energy & AI PM
GRE 328, GPA 9.65
Tepper | Mr. Tech Mil-Veteran
GMAT TBD, GPA 3.35
Columbia | Mr. European MBB Consultant
GMAT 645 (Gmat Focus), GPA 8.2
MIT Sloan | Mr. Startup Strategy
GMAT 720, GPA 3.7
Stanford GSB | Mr. Mid-Market PE
GMAT 770, GPA 4
Stanford GSB | Mr. MBB Guy From Big 4 & Startup
GRE 325, GPA 3

The Financial Times Historical MBA Rankings

Why India’s IIM ranks higher than Chicago Booth

by: John A. Byrne on April 23, 2012 | 12 minute read

A DOZEN YEARS WORTH OF THE FINANCIAL TIMES’ RANKINGS FROM 2001 TO 2012

Rank & School Index 2012 Rank Highest Rank Lowest Rank
  1. Pennsylvania (Wharton) 100.0 3 1 3
  2. Harvard Business School 99.3 2 1 5
  3. Stanford GSB 97.4 1 1 7
  4. Columbia 97.2 5 2 7
  5. London 96.9 4 1 9
  6. INSEAD 95.2 6 4 8
  7. Chicago (Booth) 94.0 12 3 12
  8. MIT (Sloan) 92.2 7 6 14
  9. New York (Stern) 90.7 17 7 17
10. Dartmouth (Tuck) 89.0 19 7 19
11. IMD 87.9 13 11 15
12. Yale 86.8 20 9 20
13. IESE Business School 86.5 9 9 25
14. IE Business School 85.8 8 6 35
15. Northwestern (Kellogg) 85.4 16 9 24
16. Duke (Fuqua) 80.8 15 15 28
17. UC-Berkeley (Haas) 80.4 14 13 32
18. Michigan (Ross) 78.4 29 14 30
19. Oxford (Said) 77.1 20 16 35
20. Virginia (Darden) 76.1 38 14 41
21. Cornell (Johnson) 75.2 24 13 36
22. Emory (Goizueta) 70.0 40 22 42
23. Cambridge (Judge) 69.6 26 10 42
24, Manchester 67.3 31 22 48
25. HEC-Paris 67.0 18 18 67

Source: The Financial Times full-time global MBA rankings NR means not ranked

(See next page for tables of The Financial Times’ historical rankings from 2001 to 2012)

Previous Page
Continue Reading

© Copyright 2026 Poets & Quants. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Poets & Quants, please submit your request HERE.