Harvard | Ms. Indian Quant
GMAT 750, GPA 7.54/10
Darden | Mr. Corporate Dev
GMAT Waived, GPA 3.8
Duke Fuqua | Mr. CPA To Finance
GMAT 700, GPA 3.5
Wharton | Mr. Big 4
GMAT 770, GPA 8/10
Wharton | Ms. General Motors
GRE 330, GPA 3.2
Stanford GSB | Mr. Venture Lawyer
GRE 330, GPA 3.4
Wharton | Ms. Project Mananger
GMAT 770, GPA 3.86
Stanford GSB | Ms. Digital Health
GMAT 720, GPA 3.48
Yale | Mr. Philanthropy Chair
GMAT Awaiting Scores (expect 700-720), GPA 3.3
Stanford GSB | Mr. MBA Class of 2023
GMAT 725, GPA 3.5
Foster School of Business | Mr. Construction Engineer
GMAT 710, GPA 2.77
Ross | Mr. Stockbroker
GMAT 700, GPA 3.1
Harvard | Mr. Harvard Hopeful
GMAT 740, GPA 3.8
Stanford GSB | Mr. LGBTQ
GMAT 740, GPA 3.58
Kellogg | Mr. Risky Business
GMAT 780, GPA 3.5
Kellogg | Mr. CPA To MBA
GMAT Waived, GPA 3.2
UCLA Anderson | Mr. Southern California
GMAT 710, GPA 3.58
Harvard | Ms. World Explorer
GMAT 710 (aiming for 750), GPA 4.33/5
Ross | Mr. Brazilian Sales Guy
GRE 326, GPA 77/100 (USA Avg. 3.0)
Kellogg | Ms. MBA For Social Impact
GMAT 720, GPA 3.9
London Business School | Mr. Consulting To IB
GMAT 700, GPA 2.4
Berkeley Haas | Mx. CPG Marketer
GMAT 750, GPA 3.95
NYU Stern | Mr. Washed-Up Athlete
GRE 325, GPA 3.4
Kellogg | Mr. White Finance
GMAT Not Taken, GPA 3.97
MIT Sloan | Mr. NFL Team Analyst
GMAT 720, GPA 3.8
Stanford GSB | Ms. Russland Native
GMAT 700, GPA 3.5
Said Business School | Mr. Impact Underdog
GRE 328, GPA 3.13/4

Why MBAs Are Even More Satisfied Than The Most Optimistic Survey Shows

graduatesEvery year, the Graduate Management Admission Council asks alumni of MBA programs all over the world if they think the time and money they spent getting the degree was worth it. And every year, the results show extremely high levels of satisfaction with the MBA.

The latest 2014 GMAC Alumni Perspectives Survey, released in March, strongly reaffirms the value of the degree. Nine in 10 (91%) recent business school alumni from 2010–2013 consider their graduate management education a good to outstanding value.

Sixty-six percent of alumni agree their education was financially rewarding. And a quarter (26%) of alumni report their expectations for recouping their financial investment were exceeded while 53% say their expectations for return on their investment (ROI) were met.


Pretty good, right? This part of the survey is based on responses from 6,862 alumni who graduated between 2010 and 2013 from some 132 business schools worldwide that partnered with GMAC in the study. The survey was conducted in October-November of 2013.

But here’s the most surprising part of the upbeat results. Most of the alumni from the best business schools in the world aren’t included in the study. By and large, there’s no alumni from Harvard, Stanford, or Wharton. None from Chicago Booth, Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, MIT Sloan, Columbia Business School, or Dartmouth’s Tuck School of Business.

For whatever reason, those schools and many more decided not to participate in the latest research. In fact, alumni from only three business schools—Virginia, Carnegie Mellon, and Indiana University—of the Top 20 in the U.S. were included in the survey.


And it’s not only the most highly selective U.S. business schools that did not participate in the study. The very best non-U.S. schools also are missing. There are no alumni from London Business School, INSEAD, IMD, HEC Paris, IE Business School, or IESE Business School.

Which schools participated in the GMAC survey? Some very good schools, of course, but also places that fail to rank among the top 100 U.S. or the top 50 non-U.S. business schools from Alliance University to Widener University (see list of participating schools here).

In other words, despite the high levels of endorsement for graduate business education, the survey doesn’t even benefit from having the views of the graduates who are most likely to be highly satisfied. After all, these are among the most highly paid MBAs in the market, the graduates who generally get the best job opportunities and graduate into the strongest alumni networks. These top schools, by the way, are also the ones that generally have the most scholarship money available to help offset the cost of the degree.


A GMAC spokesperson, Rich D’Amato, explains that “many of those schools do their own research and some schools have concerns about survey fatigue during ranking years.” He didn’t think the absence of alums from the most highly ranked schools would have that much of an impact. “Satisfaction is a measure that is relative to the individual’s expectations, experience, and perceptions. However, in year’s past, when some of the listed schools participated in the student exit survey, alumni valued their education at similar rates as the recent survey suggests.”

But satisfaction surveys over the years by other sources, such as BusinessWeek which has been polling MBA alumni since 1988, clearly show that graduates of the big brand schools tend to have higher levels of satisfaction than MBAs from second- or third-tier schools. That’s generally the outcome of the more lucrative job opportunities available to graduates of the top-tier schools.

For example, when BusinessWeek asked alumni of 88 schools around the world “To what extent did your MBA experience meet your expectations of what a good program should be?,” the school’s with the most satisfied alums were Chicago, Northwestern, Dartmouth, Virginia, Stanford, Yale, Duke, Cornell, Berkeley, and Wharton. At the bottom? Fordham, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Connecticut, South Carolina, Syracuse and Clark Atlanta.

When the magazine asked recent graduates if they would urge their friends or colleagues to enroll in the same MBA program at the school they just attended, the schools getting the most endorsements were Chicago, Northwestern, Stanford, Duke, Dartmouth, Harvard, Virginia, Wharton, UC-Berkeley, and Yale. Less enthusiastic were grads from Arizona State, George Washington, Illinois, Penn State, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Clark Atlanta, Syracuse, and South Carolina.

About The Author

John A. Byrne is the founder and editor-in-chief of C-Change Media, publishers of Poets&Quants and four other higher education websites. He has authored or co-authored more than ten books, including two New York Times bestsellers. John is the former executive editor of Businessweek, editor-in-chief of Businessweek. com, editor-in-chief of Fast Company, and the creator of the first regularly published rankings of business schools. As the co-founder of CentreCourt MBA Festivals, he hopes to meet you at the next MBA event in-person or online.