Harvard | Mr. PE Strategist
GRE 326, GPA 3.6
Harvard | Mr. Student Product Manager
GMAT 760, GPA 3.4
London Business School | Ms. FANG Tech
GRE 321, GPA 3.7
Chicago Booth | Mr. Corporate Development
GMAT 740, GPA 3.2
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Sports Management
GMAT 690, GPA 3.23
Wharton | Mr. Private Equity Analyst
GRE 320, GPA 3.3
Columbia | Mr. CPA
GMAT 720, GPA 3.5
Wharton | Mr. Digital Health Start-Up
GMAT 710, GPA 3.3
Darden | Mr. International Trade
GRE 323, GPA 3.6
Harvard | Mr. Health Clinic Founder
GRE 330, GPA 3
Said Business School | Mr. Strategy Consulting Future
GMAT 720, GPA 3.98
Stanford GSB | Mr. Robotics
GMAT 730, GPA 2.9
Stanford GSB | Mr. Aspiring Tech Entrepreneur
GMAT 690, GPA 3.4
London Business School | Mr. Supply Chain Latino
GRE 320, GPA 3.4
Duke Fuqua | Mr. Operations Manager
GRE 328, GPA 3.1
Harvard | Ms. Media Entertainment
GMAT 740, GPA 3.3
INSEAD | Mr. Jumbo GMAT
GMAT 770, GPA 3.7
Wharton | Mr. Basketball To B-School
GRE 334, GPA 3.73
Harvard | Mr. E-Sports Coach
GRE 323, GPA 5.72/10
INSEAD | Ms. Insightful Panda
GMAT 700, GPA 87.5%
NYU Stern | Mr. Bioinformatics
GMAT 710, GPA 3.7
Harvard | Mr. Impact Investment
GMAT 760, GPA 3.2
Chicago Booth | Mr. Nonprofit-ish
GRE 333, GPA 3.81
INSEAD | Ms. Humble Auditor
GMAT 710, GPA 3.56
London Business School | Mr. Investment Finance
GMAT 750, GPA 2.2
Georgetown McDonough | Ms. Healthcare Tech
GMAT 680, GPA 3.2
Chicago Booth | Mr. Civil Engineer
GMAT 770, GPA 8.9/10

The Vertigo In The Financial Times 2015 MBA Ranking

THE BIG WINNERS & LOSERS OF THE FT’S 2015 GLOBAL MBA RANKING

Even so, a big advance for a school is worth the popping of a few champagne corks and the publication of a news release touting your progress. A big decline is typically greeted by silence. So who’s crowing from the rooftops and who is as quiet as a church mouse?

The champagne is certainly flowing at Fudan University School of Management in Shanghai which jumped 28 places in the rankings to a tie in 55th place with neighbouring Shanghai Jiao Tong University’s Antai school of business which rose 22 places itself. Lancaster School of Management in the U.K. soared 27 spots to rank 50th, while ESMT (European School of Management and Technology) in Germany gained 26 positions to place 63rd. Among the U.S. schools, the biggest gain was recorded by Babson College, up 22 places to a rank of 73rd from No. 95 last year.

Besides those free falls by Rochester, Minnesota and Illinois, Penn State’s Smeal School of Business plunged 24 spots to a rank of 86 from 62 a year ago. The Melbourne Business School fell 22 positions to 90th from 68th in 2014. And of course, a number of MBA programs fell entirely off the list, having experienced double-digit drops to miss the top 100 entirely.

PEKING UNIVERSITY, HULT & YORK UNIVERSITY’S SCHULICH DISAPPEAR

Among the ten schools that did a disappearing act this year was last year’s No. 57 Peking University-Guanghua, No. 61 Hult International Business School, No. 66 York University’s Schulich School, No. 75 Texas A&M, and No. 79 Coppead in Brazil. All those schools would have had to fall by double digits to slip off the top 100 entirely. In Peking’s case, the drop suggests a fall of at least 44 places. For York’s Schulich School, the disappearance means the school’s MBA program had to plunge at least 35 spots in a single year.

Also missing from this year’s list were five other MBA programs that all had ranks in the 90s in 2014. They are Tulane University’s Freeman School, which had been ranked 92nd last year, Brigham Young University’s Marriott School, which was ranked 93rd, Wake Forest University, which announced last October that it was exiting the full-time MBA market and had been ranked 94th. Also off the list were EMLyon in France and UC-Davis in the U.S., respectively ranked 95th and 98th a year ago by the FT.

And the newcomers who replaced those schools? Most incredibly, the Chinese University of Hong Kong emerged from nowhere–at it wasn’t even on the FT list last year–and was ranked 30th, above such elite schools as the University of Virginia’s Darden School and Carnegie Mellon’s Tepper School. The University of Iowa’s Tippie School made the list this year with a rank of 63.

The University of San Diego’s tiny MBA program made its debut on the FT list at a rank of 66, quite an oddity given the fact that the school only enrolls 40 full-time MBA students a year. Macquarie Graduate School of Management in Australia came back at a rank of 68th, while Southern Methodist University’s Cox School landed in the 76th spot. Queen’s University School of Business of Canada and the University of Alberta both tied for 86th place. And Notre Dame University’s Mendoza School placed 89th. Finally, Birmingham Business School and the University of South Carolina’s Moore School came in at 95 and 96, respectively.

Fudan University School of Management

Fudan University School of Management

The Biggest Winners In The 2015 Financial Times Global MBA Ranking

SchoolGain2015 Rank2014 Rank
Fudan University+285583
Lancaster School of Management+275077
ESMT European School of Management & Technology+266389
Shanghai Jiao Tong+225577
Babson College (Olin)+227395
St. Gallen+216788
University College Dublin (Smurfit)+187391
Durham Business School+187997
The Lisbon MBA+163652
Imperial Business+153449
Mannheim+115566
Arizona State (Carey)+117687
Wisconsin Business School+117081

Source: P&Q analysis of the 2015 Financial Times Global MBA ranking

About The Author

John A. Byrne is the founder and editor-in-chief of C-Change Media, publishers of Poets&Quants and four other higher education websites. He has authored or co-authored more than ten books, including two New York Times bestsellers. John is the former executive editor of Businessweek, editor-in-chief of Businessweek. com, editor-in-chief of Fast Company, and the creator of the first regularly published rankings of business schools. As the co-founder of CentreCourt MBA Festivals, he hopes to meet you at the next MBA event in-person or online.