Wharton | Mr. Digi-Transformer
GMAT 680, GPA 4
Stanford GSB | Ms. 2+2 Tech Girl
GRE 333, GPA 3.95
Stanford GSB | Ms. Healthcare Operations To General Management
GRE 700, GPA 7.3
Chicago Booth | Ms. CS Engineer To Consultant
GMAT 720, GPA 3.31
Kenan-Flagler | Mr. Engineer In The Military
GRE 310, GPA 3.9
Ross | Mr. Automotive Compliance Professional
GMAT 710, GPA 3.7
Chicago Booth | Mr. Oil & Gas Leader
GMAT 760, GPA 6.85/10
Stanford GSB | Mr. Seeking Fellow Program
GMAT 760, GPA 3
Wharton | Mr. Real Estate Investor
GMAT 720, GPA 3.3
Cornell Johnson | Ms. Chef Instructor
GMAT 760, GPA 3.3
Harvard | Mr. Climate
GMAT 720, GPA 3.4
Wharton | Mr. New England Hopeful
GMAT 730, GPA 3.65
Berkeley Haas | Mr. Bangladeshi Data Scientist
GMAT 760, GPA 3.33
Harvard | Mr. Military Banker
GMAT 740, GPA 3.9
Ross | Ms. Packaging Manager
GMAT 730, GPA 3.47
Chicago Booth | Mr. Private Equity To Ed-Tech
GRE 326, GPA 3.4
Harvard | Mr. Gay Singaporean Strategy Consultant
GMAT 730, GPA 3.3
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Electric Vehicles Product Strategist
GRE 331, GPA 3.8
Columbia | Mr. BB Trading M/O To Hedge Fund
GMAT 710, GPA 3.23
Columbia | Mr. Old Indian Engineer
GRE 333, GPA 67%
Harvard | Mr. Athlete Turned MBB Consultant
GMAT 720, GPA 3.4
Ross | Mr. Civil Rights Lawyer
GMAT 710, GPA 3.62
Stanford GSB | Mr. Co-Founder & Analytics Manager
GMAT 750, GPA 7.4 out of 10.0 - 4th in Class
Cornell Johnson | Ms. Environmental Sustainability
GMAT N/A, GPA 7.08
Cornell Johnson | Mr. Trucking
GMAT 640, GPA 3.82
Ross | Mr. Low GRE Not-For-Profit
GRE 316, GPA 74.04% First Division (No GPA)
Harvard | Mr. Marine Pilot
GMAT 750, GPA 3.98

Kellogg MBAs Name Best Super Bowl Ads

Kellogg students watch commercials during the Super Bowl at the Allen Center Atrium in Evanston, Illinois, February 4, 2018.
Photo by Jim Young for Kellogg

Like millions of others, I grew up watching the Super Bowl with family and friends huddled in the living room yelling at the TV.

But this year was a bit different. Last night, I was surrounded by 65 students and faculty at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University in front of a massive projector, and the room was completely silent. No one moved during the action, and the room erupted during the breaks. But don’t be fooled: the action was the advertisements, and the break was the game.

Welcome to the 2018 Kellogg Bowl, also known as the Kellogg School’s Super Bowl Ad Review.

Huddled up with the ADPLAN framework

ADPLAN Framework

For the past 14 years, a select group of Kellogg students has spent Super Bowl Sunday analyzing the year’s Super Bowl ads. Leveraging summer internships as marketers for Starbucks, Amazon, P&G, Instagram, PepsiCo, and more, Kellogg students have less than 10 seconds after each ad to submit their grade using the ADPLAN framework.

Unlike other ad rankings that measure popularity, ADPLAN evaluates spots based on their strategic ability to build the business. Developed by Kellogg professors Tim Calkins and Derek Rucker, the ADPLAN framework is founded on six key metrics. Attention, Distinction and Positioning measure whether the spot grabs our attention, stands out and establishes a clear target, category and benefit. Linkage, Amplification and Net Equity evaluate whether viewers will remember the brand, receive it positively, and connect it to the brand’s existing identity.


The two advertisers that stole the show at the 2018 Kellogg Bowl were P&G (Tide) and Amazon (Echo).

“For me, Tide was the MVP of the Super Bowl,” according to Professor Rucker. A clear benefit was established (stains), linkage was clear (Tide, Tide, and more Tide), and it creatively leveraged P&G’s equity by using famous Old Spice and Mr. Clean spots as material. “I’m spending the first five seconds of every ad wondering if it’s a Tide commercial,” added Professor Rucker. “Great for Tide; not so great for other advertisers.”

“I saw the Amazon ad early,” said Professor Calkins, “and thought, ‘That’s the ad to beat.” The spot established clear benefits by portraying multiple usage occasions, wouldn’t let you forget it was for Alexa and Amazon, and was consistent with Amazon’s net equity by using a style similar to previous campaigns: humorous vignettes of customers using the product in their daily lives.

Page 1 of 2