Meet UCLA Anderson’s MBA Class of 2018

Members of UCLA Anderson's Class of 2018

Members of UCLA Anderson’s Class of 2018

The transition to business school is rarely seamless. For many, it involves traveling across the country — if not the globe. After a five year absence, these professionals are returning to a bona fide classroom, often taking subjects they’ve assiduously avoided in their careers. All the while, they’re being buried with invitations to clubs and events. It all happens so fast and there’s such a steep learning curve. On top of that, recruiters quickly flood campus — often as first years are wrestling with what they really want to do.

Juggling new people, terrain, and expectations can be overwhelming. A week-long orientation, replete with ropes courses and dances contests, rarely prepare first years for what’s ahead. That’s why some MBA programs are starting classes early. Take UCLA’s Anderson School of Management, who welcomed the Class of 2018 to campus on August 1st, six weeks earlier than previous classes. Instead of surfing the beach (or the net), Anderson MBAs are easing into their core courses and partnering with career services. Forget “summer school” as a punishment. Instead, it is a means to successfully shift gears, build community, and get a jump on the competition for internships.


Thus far, the 2018 Class has accomplished all three. However, that’s just the start. Anderson’s tagline is “Think in the next.” In many ways, it is more of a challenge to Anderson MBAs than a promise. Here, learning is measured in the expansion of knowledge as much as its acquisition. The goal is creation, with the curriculum geared to nurture graduates who “think fearlessly” and “drive change.” In fact, you’ll find plenty of forward thinkers and risk takers already accounted for in the incoming class.

Alex Lawrence, assistant dean of MBA admissions

Alex Lawrence, assistant dean of MBA admissions

Looking for someone who looks outside the box? Take Colin Meade, who is described by Alex Lawrence, assistant dean of MBA admissions, as “a great combination of intellectual strength and wanting to make a difference.” Meade once modeled a public policy course he taught at U.C.-Berkeley on the FX comedy It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. How about daring? Take your pick between Tazia Middleton and Katie Donovan. Middleton, an aspiring vegetable gardener, once kayacked alongside killer whales off the coast of San Juan Island. Donovan, who describes herself as “unambiguously enigmatic,” will fit right in at Tinseltown after playing a stunt double in a zombie film. So will Alexis Ryan, who, as an MC, introduced Hollywood royalty like Ryan Seacrest at the Cannes Lions Festival in France.

Who’s the adventurer of the class? You’d be hard-pressed to top Bulgaria’s Gergana Droumeva, who has visited 50 cities in three continents and swam in 11 oceans and seas. For versatility, your go-to guy has to be Abdulkamal Bolutife Abdullahi. Trained as a chemical engineer, he also spent five years as a stage actor in Nigeria. He was also paid one of the best compliments from Lawrence: “One of the most poised MBA students I have run across in quite some time. Someone who will make a difference when he graduates.”


It’s no surprise that students like Abdullahi set themselves apart by their poise. The Class of 2018 is accustomed to shouldering big time responsibilities and pressure. Joyce Truong, who admits to disliking MBA staples like beer and coffee, oversaw the design and implementation of Google’s annual bonus program. “I vastly improved the time-consuming and inaccurate bonus projection process with our finance counterparts, saving our teams dozens of hours of work per week and reducing the margin of error of our projections to <1%.” Equally impressive, Deloitte’s Anna Goldberg revamped a Fortune 500 company’s technology infrastructure, which involved managed communication with over 5,000 external partners.

They were also adept when it came to rescuing companies in times of crisis…billion dollar ones. Ryan, for example, was part of a team that helped her firm retain a billion dollar pharma account. “With just one day’s notice, I headed to London for two grueling weeks to prep for the pitch meetings with the clients,” she explains. “The schedule was unprecedented: we presented 9 meetings over 5 days. It was definitely a stretch, but in the end we retained the account and even added new business to the portfolio.” Abdullahi experienced high stakes crisis management at Exxon Mobil when a long-standing issue threatened to shut down a $2.2 billion dollar project at a deep water offshore facility. Working under an unforgiving deadline and sorting through an “expansive scope,” he did what all great leaders do: He formed a great team, developed a plan, and followed through on the details. “Additionally, I set monitoring and training programs in place to ensure that there would be no repeat incidents,” he says.

The UCLA Anderson School of Management

The UCLA Anderson School of Management


Looking at the numbers, the school continued to receive fewer applications in 2015-2016, dropping from 3,533 to 3,290 from the previous year (after an all-time high of 4,129 in 2013-2014). Beyond this, the 2018 class profile remained strikingly similar to previous classes. For example, the program accepted just 21% of applications, a slight uptick from 19.8% for the 2017 Class. That said, the program remains rather exclusive, boasting a lower acceptance rate than big names like Booth, Tuck, Fuqua, and Ross.

Numbering 361 members, the 2018 class comes to Westwood with a 715 GMAT average, up two points from the previous year. Scores ran from 680-750 in the mid-80% range, the same as the past two classes, with average GPA creeping up from 3.47 to 3.52. However, Lawrence takes equal pride in the program’s “fantastic diversity – cultural, academic backgrounds, professional.” For one, the class features a higher percentage of women, a two point stretch to 32%. However, international students experienced the biggest jump in the class, going from 33% in 2017 to a landmark 38% this year.

The class is equally rich in its academic and professional diversity. 28% of incoming students hold an undergraduate degree in business, with engineering (22%), humanities (16%), economics (16%), and math and science (7%) comprising other large blocs of the class. The school also continues to attract professionals from high tech, with the percentage rising from 22% to 28% in the 2018 Class. They are followed by finance (25%), consulting (15% – down five points from the previous year), public sector and non-profits (9%), consumer goods (9%), healthcare and biotech (7%), entertainment and media (6%), and real estate (3%).

  • MBA2018

    I agree with this observation 🙂

  • 2and20 are absolutely out of your mind if you think Marshall is in the same tier as Stanford or Haas. Sincerely, an employee at a tier 1 employer filled with HBS and Wharton grads.

  • C. Taylor

    Impressions and preferences of some folks aside, it is solidly in the 2nd tier. Marshall grads find success.

    Below the usual suspects, rankings are pretty ineffective comparators.

  • Red Layug

    The top employers do not regard Marshall an equall of Stanford and Haas.

    Those top employers that regularly attract Stanford and Haas grads (often, are also the same employers that attract HBS, Wharton and Sloan grads) do not hire Marshall grads, unless, perhaps, you are the top 1 or 2 guy from Marshall and you went out of your way to earn a spot at those companies/firms.
    The Marshall MBA is a good program. But to the sight of the top students and top employers, it sadly is a tier 3 program.

  • Red Layug

    “University of California schools are lower in reputation and resources.”

    That is so undergrad mentality. Most business schools have some level if independence from the mother university. Haas is only about 90% dependent on UC Berkeley, due mainly to the presence of the undergrad profram which is still receiving funding from the mother university. But even that will soon change.

  • HBS 2018

    While people are debating below regarding which school in Cali is better, can I just mention that Alexis from page 10 is kinda cute.

  • Ronaldo

    It was ranked low because of the same reasons that put INSEAD ahead of Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, and MIT in the FT ranking! The same reasons that put Texas McCombs ahead of NYU in US news ranking, the same reasons that put Duke #1 in BW ranking last year! This is the point, rankings alone do not determine the quality of the institution, the major things in my opinion are: quality of students, quality of faculty, school history, employment stats, firms recruiting its students, alumni base and achievements, and location and links to industry. No one can deny that USC marshall is the world’s best university for entertainment industry , movie , and films. The school of cinematic arts is the center of world movie industry with all its technological innovation in visualization , animation, and display. Second, USC is one of the world best universities (if not the best indeed) in mobile telecommunication industry. Marshall school is one of the top ten in accounting and international business. Technology and business analytics are one of the strong areas at Marshall. The school location is another big advantage. It also has incredible base of highly successful and strongly loyal alumni. All these factors help USC Marshall to be solid tier 1 school, a solid top 15 school, with a tiny margin to any one of the top 10. I am not affiliated by any mean to Marshall, but I know it from searches and readings and I know for sure it is very very underrated by rankings. Just look at their latest employment report and see the quality of recruiters, positions, and salaries.

  • Amy

    I hate to be so blunt but then how do you explain the low rankings Marshall consistently receives, especially relative to the other California schools? I am assuming you are either a graduate or an employee of the school so I’m hoping you can enlighten us 🙂

  • Ronaldo

    If the stats such as GMAT, GPA, selectivity are the main things to differentiate between good or not good schools, then IIM-A in india should be the world’s best, by far. with selectivity less than 1%, GMAT of 760 or so as average and nearly perfect GPA. Another example is Duke university with GMAT less than 700 yet, it is by all measures a top tier business school and core institution for MBB and prestigious firms and offer the exact quality of education of Harvard, Stanford and Wharton, while on the other hand, UNC-Kenan Flagler has a GMAT over 710, however, it is far behind duke. The point is stats alone don’t determine the quality of the institution or prestige.

  • MBA-Recruiting

    I did not mean the ranking of marshall or anderson in these rankings, I meant that I don’t take these rankings as the major measure for the two schools quality and strengths. This is very important as it could be very misleading to judge schools merely (or largely) based on ranking.

  • Eddie

    All three 2016 rankings that are out (FT, Economist, US News) have them in that exact order similar to last year. The gap between Anderson and Marshall isn’t exactly close in any of them…

  • Amy

    Let’s not get carried away here… I mean no offense to the USC Marshall crowd but it is silly to say that the school is comparable to Stanford (look at number of applications, GMAT scores, GPA, selectivity etc…). The avg GMAT at Marshall isn’t even over 700…

  • Ronaldo

    No, Marshall School of Business is comparable to Stanford Graduate School of Business. The two schools offer high quality education and attract the brightest students from across the globe. University of California schools are lower in reputation and resources.

  • MBA-Recruiting

    I respectfully disagree. Rankings are subjective and most times do not reflect the real value. It is hard to believe that NYU is in 20s rank! (US NEWS rank, despite being the most reliable ranking). In FT MBA rank, INSEAD is better than Stanford and Harvard! and IE better than Tuck and Duke!! In the economist ranking, you find every mess you would have imagined. In BW they put Duke number 1 last year !, So, my point is to take the ranking with a barrel of salt! There are things that determine which school is top tier or not, such as, its alumni, statistics, employers, strengths of mother university, location, history, faculty reputation, quality of students, etc.. If you take all those factors together and try to evaluate the top four business schools in California, Stanford, Haas, Anderson, and Marshall, you would find that Stanford is the best, followed by Haas, and it is quite hard to differentiate between Anderson and Marshall.

  • Eddie

    You had me until you put USC Marshall and Stanford in the same sentence. Then I realized you were another Marshall troll. Or maybe the same one that has been trying to convince people in comments that it is somehow a top 10 program.

    Among California programs it goes like this: Stanford (Top 2-3), Berkeley (Top 8-10), UCLA Anderson (Top 15), USC Marshall (Top 30)

  • Edward

    This is strong class. UCLA Anderson has managed to have this solid cohort of talents. This school increasingly becoming direct threat to USC Marshall and Stanford in quality education, prestige, and attracting the strongest applicants.